Side by side · verified from each firm's own pages
FundedNext vs Lux Trading Firm
Rules placed next to each other, with the calculation basis written out — because two firms quoting the same percentage can be measuring completely different things.
What differs most.
- FundedNext has no consistency rule on this plan; Lux Trading Firm does.
- Account closed
- Trading day over, account survives
- Room to lose on day one
- Profit still needed to pass phase one
![]() FundedNext United Arab Emirates |
Lux Trading Firm United Kingdom |
|
|---|---|---|
| Disclosure score |
Partially documented |
Partially documented |
| Challenge from | $59.99 list, USD | £199 list, GBP |
| Plan compared | Stellar 2-Step | 1-Step Evaluation $100K |
| Model | 2-Step | 1-Step |
| Profit target | 8% → 5% | 10% → 10% |
| Daily loss limit | 5% of initial balance, on equity, including floating P/L. Resets 00:00 server time | Not yet verified? |
| Maximum loss limit | 10% Static floor, from initial balance | 6% Static floor, from initial balance |
| Consistency | No consistency rule | 5% — one trade idea as a share of the profit target (Evaluation and payout) |
| Stop loss | Not yet verified? | Mandatory |
| Best profit split | 95% 95% Add-On | 80% Funded |
| Weekend holding | Not yet verified? | Not yet verified? |
| News trading | Not yet verified? | Restricted window |
| Inactivity breach | 60 days | Not yet verified? |
| Retroactive rule changes | 0 | 0 |
| Operator jurisdiction | United Arab Emirates (Ajman Free Zone) | England and Wales |
| Regulator disclosed | Not yet verified? | Not yet verified? |
| Restricted countries | Terms of Service 5.3 (5 May 2026, Tier A) — 'Restricted Countries – CFDs', 20 named: Bangladesh, Myanmar, Belarus, North Korea, Syria, Grenada, Chad, Malaysia, Belize, Antigua and Barbuda, Cape Verde, Tuvalu, Vietnam, Bouvet Island, Burundi, Cook Islands, Eritrea, Comoros, Sri Lanka, Fiji. The trading-objectives page (Tier B) lists only five (North Korea, Myanmar, Belarus, Iran, Russia) — a shorter, different list; both are recorded and the contract governs. Note Comoros itself is on the list while an affiliated entity is registered there. | Not yet verified? |
Only the first recorded plan of each firm is shown here. Full plan detail, sources and everything we could not verify are on each firm's page. Last re-checked 7 September 2026; the oldest record on this page was checked 5 September 2026. Each firm page carries its own date.
Not yet verified is not No. Where a cell reads "Not yet verified", we could not confirm the rule from the firm's own terms or help centre. It is not a claim that the rule does not exist.
Other comparisons
FundingPips vs Lux Trading Firm
Hola Prime vs Lux Trading Firm
FTMO vs FundedNext
FTMO vs Lux Trading Firm
FundedNext vs FundingPips
FundedNext vs Hola Prime
FundedNext vs The 5%ers
FundedNext vs FXIFY
FundedNext vs Goat Funded Trader
FundedNext vs FunderPro
FundedNext vs Maven Trading
FundedNext vs Funding Traders
FundedNext vs OFP Funding
FundedNext vs The Trading Pit
Alpha Capital Group vs FundedNext
Alpha Capital Group vs Lux Trading Firm
E8 Markets vs FundedNext
E8 Markets vs Lux Trading Firm
BrightFunded vs FundedNext
BrightFunded vs Lux Trading Firm
FXIFY vs Lux Trading Firm
Goat Funded Trader vs Lux Trading Firm
FunderPro vs Lux Trading Firm
Blueberry Funded vs FundedNext
Blueberry Funded vs Lux Trading Firm
Funding Traders vs Lux Trading Firm
City Traders Imperium vs FundedNext
City Traders Imperium vs Lux Trading Firm
FTUK vs FundedNext
FTUK vs Lux Trading Firm
Audacity Capital vs FundedNext
Audacity Capital vs Lux Trading Firm
Lux Trading Firm vs The 5%ers
Lux Trading Firm vs Maven Trading
Lux Trading Firm vs OFP Funding
Lux Trading Firm vs The Trading Pit
AquaFunded vs FundedNext
AquaFunded vs Lux Trading Firm
