PropFirmQuest PropFirmQuest
Side by side · verified from each firm's own pages

Funding Traders vs Lux Trading Firm

Rules placed next to each other, with the calculation basis written out — because two firms quoting the same percentage can be measuring completely different things.

What differs most.
  • One uses a Trailing, intraday maximum loss, the other Static floor.
  • Lux Trading Firm requires a stop loss on every trade; Funding Traders does not.
A $100,000 account, day one — one shared scale $100,000 start Funding Traders — 1-Step Pro $90,000 $97,000 $110,000 Lux Trading Firm — 1-Step Evaluation $100K $94,000 $110,000
  • Account closed
  • Trading day over, account survives
  • Room to lose on day one
  • Profit still needed to pass phase one
Drawn to scale from each plan's own published numbers, on the plan compared in the table below. Day one is the only day on which every daily-loss basis agrees, which is what makes the two bars honestly comparable at all. On day one the account closes first at Lux Trading Firm — its floor sits $4,000 above the floor at Funding Traders. Funding Traders uses a trailing maximum-loss floor: the bar shows where it sits on day one, and it rises with your peak without ever coming back down. We could not confirm a daily loss limit for the Lux Trading Firm plan from the firm's own pages, so that mark is absent. That is not a claim the rule does not exist.
Funding Traders logo
Funding Traders
United States
Lux Trading Firm logo
Lux Trading Firm
United Kingdom
Disclosure score
83 Well documented
66 Partially documented
Challenge from$49
list, USD
£199
list, GBP
Plan compared1-Step Pro1-Step Evaluation $100K
Model1-Step1-Step
Profit target10%10% → 10%
Daily loss limit3% of the balance recorded at day start, on balance or equityNot yet verified
Maximum loss limit10% Trailing, intraday, from the highest end-of-day balance6% Static floor, from initial balance
Consistency50% — best day as a share of total profit (Payout eligibility)5% — one trade idea as a share of the profit target (Evaluation and payout)
Stop lossNot requiredMandatory
Best profit split90% Default80% Funded
Weekend holdingNot yet verifiedNot yet verified
News tradingRestricted windowRestricted window
Inactivity breachNot yet verifiedNot yet verified
Retroactive rule changes00
Operator jurisdictionFlorida, United StatesEngland and Wales
Regulator disclosedNot yet verifiedNot yet verified
Restricted countriesAfghanistan, Kazakhstan, Mongolia, Morocco, Poland, Taiwan, Ukraine, Venezuela, Central African Republic, North Korea, Congo, Zaire, Iran, Iraq, Libya, Mali, Saipan, Somalia, South Sudan, Yemen, Ontario (Canada), Myanmar (site footer, 22 named). MT5 not offered to US citizens or residents.Not yet verified
Only the first recorded plan of each firm is shown here. Full plan detail, sources and everything we could not verify are on each firm's page. Every dated record here was last re-checked against the firm's own pages on 7 September 2026.
Not yet verified is not No. Where a cell reads "Not yet verified", we could not confirm the rule from the firm's own terms or help centre. It is not a claim that the rule does not exist.

Other comparisons