PropFirmQuest PropFirmQuest
Side by side · verified from each firm's own pages

Audacity Capital vs FundedNext

Rules placed next to each other, with the calculation basis written out — because two firms quoting the same percentage can be measuring completely different things.

What differs most.
  • They calculate the daily loss limit from different reference points, so the percentages are not directly comparable.
A $100,000 account, day one — one shared scale $100,000 start Audacity Capital — Ability Challenge (2 Steps) $85,000 $92,500 $110,000 FundedNext — Stellar 2-Step $90,000 $95,000 $108,000
  • Account closed
  • Trading day over, account survives
  • Room to lose on day one
  • Profit still needed to pass phase one
Drawn to scale from each plan's own published numbers, on the plan compared in the table below. Day one is the only day on which every daily-loss basis agrees, which is what makes the two bars honestly comparable at all. On day one the account closes first at FundedNext — its floor sits $5,000 above the floor at Audacity Capital. The two daily-loss floors are measured from different reference points, so they only line up on day one. From day two they move apart.
Audacity Capital logo
Audacity Capital
Comoros Union
FundedNext logo
FundedNext
United Arab Emirates
Disclosure score
89 Well documented
69 Partially documented
Challenge from$49
list, USD
$59.99
list, USD
Plan comparedAbility Challenge (2 Steps)Stellar 2-Step
Model2-Step2-Step
Profit target10% → 5%8% → 5%
Daily loss limit7.5% of the higher of the previous day’s closing balance or closing equity, on balance or equity. Resets 00:00 GMT+2 (server rollover)5% of initial balance, on equity, including floating P/L. Resets 00:00 server time
Maximum loss limit15% Static floor, from initial balance10% Static floor, from initial balance
ConsistencyNo consistency ruleNo consistency rule
Stop lossNot requiredNot yet verified
Best profit split85% Live account95% 95% Add-On
Weekend holdingAllowedNot yet verified
News tradingAllowedNot yet verified
Inactivity breach180 days60 days
Retroactive rule changes00
Operator jurisdictionUnion of Comoros (Anjouan)United Arab Emirates (Ajman Free Zone)
Regulator disclosedUnion of Comoros — International Brokerage and Clearing House Licence L15850/WLNot yet verified
Restricted countriesSyria, Iran, North Korea 'including but not limited to' (site footer, 3 named). US residents may take part only via DXtrade where permitted.Terms of Service 5.3 (5 May 2026, Tier A) — 'Restricted Countries – CFDs', 20 named: Bangladesh, Myanmar, Belarus, North Korea, Syria, Grenada, Chad, Malaysia, Belize, Antigua and Barbuda, Cape Verde, Tuvalu, Vietnam, Bouvet Island, Burundi, Cook Islands, Eritrea, Comoros, Sri Lanka, Fiji. The trading-objectives page (Tier B) lists only five (North Korea, Myanmar, Belarus, Iran, Russia) — a shorter, different list; both are recorded and the contract governs. Note Comoros itself is on the list while an affiliated entity is registered there.
Only the first recorded plan of each firm is shown here. Full plan detail, sources and everything we could not verify are on each firm's page. Last re-checked 7 September 2026; the oldest record on this page was checked 5 September 2026. Each firm page carries its own date.
Not yet verified is not No. Where a cell reads "Not yet verified", we could not confirm the rule from the firm's own terms or help centre. It is not a claim that the rule does not exist.

Other comparisons