Side by side · verified from each firm's own pages
Audacity Capital vs Lux Trading Firm
Rules placed next to each other, with the calculation basis written out — because two firms quoting the same percentage can be measuring completely different things.
What differs most.
- Audacity Capital has no consistency rule on this plan; Lux Trading Firm does.
- Lux Trading Firm requires a stop loss on every trade; Audacity Capital does not.
- Account closed
- Trading day over, account survives
- Room to lose on day one
- Profit still needed to pass phase one
Audacity Capital Comoros Union |
Lux Trading Firm United Kingdom |
|
|---|---|---|
| Disclosure score |
Well documented |
Partially documented |
| Challenge from | $49 list, USD | £199 list, GBP |
| Plan compared | Ability Challenge (2 Steps) | 1-Step Evaluation $100K |
| Model | 2-Step | 1-Step |
| Profit target | 10% → 5% | 10% → 10% |
| Daily loss limit | 7.5% of the higher of the previous day’s closing balance or closing equity, on balance or equity. Resets 00:00 GMT+2 (server rollover) | Not yet verified? |
| Maximum loss limit | 15% Static floor, from initial balance | 6% Static floor, from initial balance |
| Consistency | No consistency rule | 5% — one trade idea as a share of the profit target (Evaluation and payout) |
| Stop loss | Not required | Mandatory |
| Best profit split | 85% Live account | 80% Funded |
| Weekend holding | Allowed | Not yet verified? |
| News trading | Allowed | Restricted window |
| Inactivity breach | 180 days | Not yet verified? |
| Retroactive rule changes | 0 | 0 |
| Operator jurisdiction | Union of Comoros (Anjouan) | England and Wales |
| Regulator disclosed | Union of Comoros — International Brokerage and Clearing House Licence L15850/WL | Not yet verified? |
| Restricted countries | Syria, Iran, North Korea 'including but not limited to' (site footer, 3 named). US residents may take part only via DXtrade where permitted. | Not yet verified? |
Only the first recorded plan of each firm is shown here. Full plan detail, sources and everything we could not verify are on each firm's page. Every dated record here was last re-checked against the firm's own pages on 7 September 2026.
Not yet verified is not No. Where a cell reads "Not yet verified", we could not confirm the rule from the firm's own terms or help centre. It is not a claim that the rule does not exist.
Other comparisons
FundingPips vs Lux Trading Firm
Hola Prime vs Lux Trading Firm
FTMO vs Lux Trading Firm
FundedNext vs Lux Trading Firm
Alpha Capital Group vs Audacity Capital
Alpha Capital Group vs Lux Trading Firm
E8 Markets vs Lux Trading Firm
BrightFunded vs Lux Trading Firm
FXIFY vs Lux Trading Firm
Goat Funded Trader vs Lux Trading Firm
FunderPro vs Lux Trading Firm
Blueberry Funded vs Lux Trading Firm
Funding Traders vs Lux Trading Firm
City Traders Imperium vs Lux Trading Firm
FTUK vs Lux Trading Firm
Audacity Capital vs FundingPips
Audacity Capital vs Hola Prime
Audacity Capital vs FTMO
Audacity Capital vs FundedNext
Audacity Capital vs The 5%ers
Audacity Capital vs E8 Markets
Audacity Capital vs BrightFunded
Audacity Capital vs FXIFY
Audacity Capital vs Goat Funded Trader
Audacity Capital vs FunderPro
Audacity Capital vs Maven Trading
Audacity Capital vs Blueberry Funded
Audacity Capital vs Funding Traders
Audacity Capital vs OFP Funding
Audacity Capital vs City Traders Imperium
Audacity Capital vs The Trading Pit
Audacity Capital vs FTUK
Lux Trading Firm vs The 5%ers
Lux Trading Firm vs Maven Trading
Lux Trading Firm vs OFP Funding
Lux Trading Firm vs The Trading Pit
AquaFunded vs Audacity Capital
AquaFunded vs Lux Trading Firm