PropFirmQuest PropFirmQuest
Side by side · verified from each firm's own pages

Alpha Capital Group vs FundedNext

Rules placed next to each other, with the calculation basis written out — because two firms quoting the same percentage can be measuring completely different things.

What differs most.
  • They calculate the daily loss limit from different reference points, so the percentages are not directly comparable.
  • FundedNext has no consistency rule on this plan; Alpha Capital Group does.
A $100,000 account, day one — one shared scale $100,000 start Alpha Capital Group — Alpha One $94,000 $96,000 $110,000 FundedNext — Stellar 2-Step $90,000 $95,000 $108,000
  • Account closed
  • Trading day over, account survives
  • Room to lose on day one
  • Profit still needed to pass phase one
Drawn to scale from each plan's own published numbers, on the plan compared in the table below. Day one is the only day on which every daily-loss basis agrees, which is what makes the two bars honestly comparable at all. On day one the account closes first at Alpha Capital Group — its floor sits $4,000 above the floor at FundedNext. The two daily-loss floors are measured from different reference points, so they only line up on day one. From day two they move apart.
Alpha Capital Group logo
Alpha Capital Group
United Kingdom
FundedNext logo
FundedNext
United Arab Emirates
Disclosure score
81 Well documented
69 Partially documented
Challenge from$27
stated floor
$59.99
list, USD
Plan comparedAlpha OneStellar 2-Step
Model1-Step2-Step
Profit target10%8% → 5%
Daily loss limit4% of the higher of opening balance or opening equity, on equity, including floating P/L. Resets 00:00 GMT+35% of initial balance, on equity, including floating P/L. Resets 00:00 server time
Maximum loss limit6% , from the highest end-of-day balance10% Static floor, from initial balance
Consistency40% — best day as a share of total profit (Payout eligibility)No consistency rule
Stop lossNot yet verifiedNot yet verified
Best profit split80% On-demand95% 95% Add-On
Weekend holdingAllowedNot yet verified
News tradingNot yet verifiedNot yet verified
Inactivity breach30 days60 days
Retroactive rule changes00
Operator jurisdictionUnited KingdomUnited Arab Emirates (Ajman Free Zone)
Regulator disclosedNot yet verifiedNot yet verified
Restricted countriesAfghanistan, Belarus, Burundi, Central African Republic, Chad, Cuba, DR Congo, Eritrea, Iran, Iraq, Libya, Myanmar, North Korea, Russia, Somalia, South Sudan, Sudan, Syria, Venezuela, Vietnam, Yemen (21, from the firm's checkout list dated 2026-07-23). US residents: no MT5, cTrader closed to new US customers.Terms of Service 5.3 (5 May 2026, Tier A) — 'Restricted Countries – CFDs', 20 named: Bangladesh, Myanmar, Belarus, North Korea, Syria, Grenada, Chad, Malaysia, Belize, Antigua and Barbuda, Cape Verde, Tuvalu, Vietnam, Bouvet Island, Burundi, Cook Islands, Eritrea, Comoros, Sri Lanka, Fiji. The trading-objectives page (Tier B) lists only five (North Korea, Myanmar, Belarus, Iran, Russia) — a shorter, different list; both are recorded and the contract governs. Note Comoros itself is on the list while an affiliated entity is registered there.
Only the first recorded plan of each firm is shown here. Full plan detail, sources and everything we could not verify are on each firm's page. Last re-checked 5 September 2026; the oldest record on this page was checked 4 September 2026. Each firm page carries its own date.
Not yet verified is not No. Where a cell reads "Not yet verified", we could not confirm the rule from the firm's own terms or help centre. It is not a claim that the rule does not exist.

Other comparisons