PropFirmQuest PropFirmQuest
Side by side · verified from each firm's own pages

FXIFY vs Lux Trading Firm

Rules placed next to each other, with the calculation basis written out — because two firms quoting the same percentage can be measuring completely different things.

What differs most.
  • One uses a Trailing, intraday maximum loss, the other Static floor.
A $100,000 account, day one — one shared scale $100,000 start FXIFY — Two Phase $90,000 $96,000 $110,000 Lux Trading Firm — 1-Step Evaluation $100K $94,000 $110,000
  • Account closed
  • Trading day over, account survives
  • Room to lose on day one
  • Profit still needed to pass phase one
Drawn to scale from each plan's own published numbers, on the plan compared in the table below. Day one is the only day on which every daily-loss basis agrees, which is what makes the two bars honestly comparable at all. On day one the account closes first at Lux Trading Firm — its floor sits $4,000 above the floor at FXIFY. FXIFY uses a trailing maximum-loss floor: the bar shows where it sits on day one, and it rises with your peak without ever coming back down. We could not confirm a daily loss limit for the Lux Trading Firm plan from the firm's own pages, so that mark is absent. That is not a claim the rule does not exist.
FXIFY logo
FXIFY
Mauritius
Lux Trading Firm logo
Lux Trading Firm
United Kingdom
Disclosure score
60 Partially documented
66 Partially documented
Challenge fromNot yet verified£199
list, GBP
Plan comparedTwo Phase1-Step Evaluation $100K
Model2-Step1-Step
Profit target10% → 5%10% → 10%
Daily loss limit4% of the previous day’s closing balanceNot yet verified
Maximum loss limit10% Trailing, intraday, from the highest equity reached6% Static floor, from initial balance
ConsistencyNot yet verified5% — one trade idea as a share of the profit target (Evaluation and payout)
Stop lossNot yet verifiedMandatory
Best profit splitNot yet verified80% Funded
Weekend holdingNot yet verifiedNot yet verified
News tradingNot yet verifiedRestricted window
Inactivity breach60 daysNot yet verified
Retroactive rule changes00
Operator jurisdictionMauritiusEngland and Wales
Regulator disclosedFinancial Services Commission, Mauritius GB24204066Not yet verified
Restricted countriesUnited States, Zimbabwe, Iran, Iraq, North Korea, Somalia, Vietnam, Burundi, Central African Republic, Ivory Coast, Liberia, Libya, Sudan, Cuba, Syria, Afghanistan, Yemen, Palestine, Myanmar, Nicaragua, Congo Republic, Crimea, Democratic Republic of Congo, Eritrea, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Papua New Guinea, South Sudan, Vanuatu, Venezuela, Algeria, Russia, Belarus, Kenya, Ghana (site footer, 35 named, 'including').Not yet verified
Only the first recorded plan of each firm is shown here. Full plan detail, sources and everything we could not verify are on each firm's page. Every dated record here was last re-checked against the firm's own pages on 7 September 2026.
Not yet verified is not No. Where a cell reads "Not yet verified", we could not confirm the rule from the firm's own terms or help centre. It is not a claim that the rule does not exist.

Other comparisons