Side by side · verified from each firm's own pages
FXIFY vs Lux Trading Firm
Rules placed next to each other, with the calculation basis written out — because two firms quoting the same percentage can be measuring completely different things.
What differs most.
- One uses a Trailing, intraday maximum loss, the other Static floor.
- Account closed
- Trading day over, account survives
- Room to lose on day one
- Profit still needed to pass phase one
FXIFY Mauritius |
Lux Trading Firm United Kingdom |
|
|---|---|---|
| Disclosure score |
Partially documented |
Partially documented |
| Challenge from | Not yet verified? | £199 list, GBP |
| Plan compared | Two Phase | 1-Step Evaluation $100K |
| Model | 2-Step | 1-Step |
| Profit target | 10% → 5% | 10% → 10% |
| Daily loss limit | 4% of the previous day’s closing balance | Not yet verified? |
| Maximum loss limit | 10% Trailing, intraday, from the highest equity reached | 6% Static floor, from initial balance |
| Consistency | Not yet verified? | 5% — one trade idea as a share of the profit target (Evaluation and payout) |
| Stop loss | Not yet verified? | Mandatory |
| Best profit split | Not yet verified? | 80% Funded |
| Weekend holding | Not yet verified? | Not yet verified? |
| News trading | Not yet verified? | Restricted window |
| Inactivity breach | 60 days | Not yet verified? |
| Retroactive rule changes | 0 | 0 |
| Operator jurisdiction | Mauritius | England and Wales |
| Regulator disclosed | Financial Services Commission, Mauritius GB24204066 | Not yet verified? |
| Restricted countries | United States, Zimbabwe, Iran, Iraq, North Korea, Somalia, Vietnam, Burundi, Central African Republic, Ivory Coast, Liberia, Libya, Sudan, Cuba, Syria, Afghanistan, Yemen, Palestine, Myanmar, Nicaragua, Congo Republic, Crimea, Democratic Republic of Congo, Eritrea, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Papua New Guinea, South Sudan, Vanuatu, Venezuela, Algeria, Russia, Belarus, Kenya, Ghana (site footer, 35 named, 'including'). | Not yet verified? |
Only the first recorded plan of each firm is shown here. Full plan detail, sources and everything we could not verify are on each firm's page. Every dated record here was last re-checked against the firm's own pages on 7 September 2026.
Not yet verified is not No. Where a cell reads "Not yet verified", we could not confirm the rule from the firm's own terms or help centre. It is not a claim that the rule does not exist.
Other comparisons
FundingPips vs FXIFY
FundingPips vs Lux Trading Firm
Hola Prime vs Lux Trading Firm
FTMO vs FXIFY
FTMO vs Lux Trading Firm
FundedNext vs FXIFY
FundedNext vs Lux Trading Firm
Alpha Capital Group vs FXIFY
Alpha Capital Group vs Lux Trading Firm
E8 Markets vs FXIFY
E8 Markets vs Lux Trading Firm
BrightFunded vs FXIFY
BrightFunded vs Lux Trading Firm
FXIFY vs Hola Prime
FXIFY vs The 5%ers
FXIFY vs Goat Funded Trader
FXIFY vs Maven Trading
FXIFY vs OFP Funding
FXIFY vs The Trading Pit
Goat Funded Trader vs Lux Trading Firm
FunderPro vs FXIFY
FunderPro vs Lux Trading Firm
Blueberry Funded vs FXIFY
Blueberry Funded vs Lux Trading Firm
Funding Traders vs FXIFY
Funding Traders vs Lux Trading Firm
City Traders Imperium vs FXIFY
City Traders Imperium vs Lux Trading Firm
FTUK vs FXIFY
FTUK vs Lux Trading Firm
Audacity Capital vs FXIFY
Audacity Capital vs Lux Trading Firm
Lux Trading Firm vs The 5%ers
Lux Trading Firm vs Maven Trading
Lux Trading Firm vs OFP Funding
Lux Trading Firm vs The Trading Pit
AquaFunded vs FXIFY
AquaFunded vs Lux Trading Firm