PropFirmQuest PropFirmQuest
Side by side · verified from each firm's own pages

FundedNext vs FundingPips

Rules placed next to each other, with the calculation basis written out — because two firms quoting the same percentage can be measuring completely different things.

What differs most.
  • They calculate the daily loss limit from different reference points, so the percentages are not directly comparable.
  • FundedNext has no consistency rule on this plan; FundingPips does.
A $100,000 account, day one — one shared scale $100,000 start FundedNext — Stellar 2-Step $90,000 $95,000 $108,000 FundingPips — 2 Step Standard $90,000 $95,000 $108,000
  • Account closed
  • Trading day over, account survives
  • Room to lose on day one
  • Profit still needed to pass phase one
Drawn to scale from each plan's own published numbers, on the plan compared in the table below. Day one is the only day on which every daily-loss basis agrees, which is what makes the two bars honestly comparable at all. Both maximum-loss floors sit at the same place on day one, $90,000. The two daily-loss floors are measured from different reference points, so they only line up on day one. From day two they move apart.
FundedNext logo
FundedNext
United Arab Emirates
FundingPips logo
FundingPips
Comoros Union
Disclosure score
69 Partially documented
100 Fully documented
Challenge from$59.99
list, USD
$29
stated floor
Plan comparedStellar 2-Step2 Step Standard
Model2-Step2-Step
Profit target8% → 5%8% → 5%
Daily loss limit5% of initial balance, on equity, including floating P/L. Resets 00:00 server time5% of the higher of opening balance or opening equity, on equity, including floating P/L. Resets 00:00 Platform Time (UTC+3)
Maximum loss limit10% Static floor, from initial balance10% Static floor, from initial balance
ConsistencyNo consistency rule35% — best day as a share of total profit (Payout eligibility)
Stop lossNot yet verifiedNot required
Best profit split95% 95% Add-On100% Monthly
Weekend holdingNot yet verifiedTemporarily not allowed
News tradingNot yet verifiedRestricted window
Inactivity breach60 days30 days
Retroactive rule changes00
Operator jurisdictionUnited Arab Emirates (Ajman Free Zone)Comoros Union
Regulator disclosedNot yet verifiedComoros — IBC Regulation Act 2014 Bfx2024004
Restricted countriesTerms of Service 5.3 (5 May 2026, Tier A) — 'Restricted Countries – CFDs', 20 named: Bangladesh, Myanmar, Belarus, North Korea, Syria, Grenada, Chad, Malaysia, Belize, Antigua and Barbuda, Cape Verde, Tuvalu, Vietnam, Bouvet Island, Burundi, Cook Islands, Eritrea, Comoros, Sri Lanka, Fiji. The trading-objectives page (Tier B) lists only five (North Korea, Myanmar, Belarus, Iran, Russia) — a shorter, different list; both are recorded and the contract governs. Note Comoros itself is on the list while an affiliated entity is registered there.FATF and EU/UN sanctions list countries, Vietnam, United Arab Emirates
Only the first recorded plan of each firm is shown here. Full plan detail, sources and everything we could not verify are on each firm's page. Last re-checked 5 September 2026; the oldest record on this page was checked 4 September 2026. Each firm page carries its own date.
Not yet verified is not No. Where a cell reads "Not yet verified", we could not confirm the rule from the firm's own terms or help centre. It is not a claim that the rule does not exist.

Other comparisons