Side by side · verified from each firm's own pages
City Traders Imperium vs Lux Trading Firm
Rules placed next to each other, with the calculation basis written out — because two firms quoting the same percentage can be measuring completely different things.
What differs most.
- City Traders Imperium has no consistency rule on this plan; Lux Trading Firm does.
- Lux Trading Firm requires a stop loss on every trade; City Traders Imperium does not.
- Account closed
- Trading day over, account survives
- Room to lose on day one
- Profit still needed to pass phase one
![]() City Traders Imperium Comoros Union |
Lux Trading Firm United Kingdom |
|
|---|---|---|
| Disclosure score |
Partially documented |
Partially documented |
| Challenge from | $39 list, USD | £199 list, GBP |
| Plan compared | 2-Step Challenge | 1-Step Evaluation $100K |
| Model | 2-Step | 1-Step |
| Profit target | 10% → 5% | 10% → 10% |
| Daily loss limit | 5% of the balance recorded at day start, on balance, closed trades only | Not yet verified? |
| Maximum loss limit | 10% Static floor, from initial balance | 6% Static floor, from initial balance |
| Consistency | No consistency rule | 5% — one trade idea as a share of the profit target (Evaluation and payout) |
| Stop loss | Not required | Mandatory |
| Best profit split | 80% Funded (start) | 80% Funded |
| Weekend holding | Allowed | Not yet verified? |
| News trading | Allowed | Restricted window |
| Inactivity breach | Not yet verified? | Not yet verified? |
| Retroactive rule changes | 0 | 0 |
| Operator jurisdiction | Comoros Union (Anjouan) | England and Wales |
| Regulator disclosed | Not yet verified? | Not yet verified? |
| Restricted countries | North Korea, Iran, Syria, Cuba, Russia, and any individual under international sanctions (site footer, 5 named). | Not yet verified? |
Only the first recorded plan of each firm is shown here. Full plan detail, sources and everything we could not verify are on each firm's page. Every dated record here was last re-checked against the firm's own pages on 7 September 2026.
Not yet verified is not No. Where a cell reads "Not yet verified", we could not confirm the rule from the firm's own terms or help centre. It is not a claim that the rule does not exist.
Other comparisons
FundingPips vs Lux Trading Firm
Hola Prime vs Lux Trading Firm
FTMO vs Lux Trading Firm
FundedNext vs Lux Trading Firm
Alpha Capital Group vs City Traders Imperium
Alpha Capital Group vs Lux Trading Firm
E8 Markets vs Lux Trading Firm
BrightFunded vs City Traders Imperium
BrightFunded vs Lux Trading Firm
FXIFY vs Lux Trading Firm
Goat Funded Trader vs Lux Trading Firm
FunderPro vs Lux Trading Firm
Blueberry Funded vs City Traders Imperium
Blueberry Funded vs Lux Trading Firm
Funding Traders vs Lux Trading Firm
City Traders Imperium vs FundingPips
City Traders Imperium vs Hola Prime
City Traders Imperium vs FTMO
City Traders Imperium vs FundedNext
City Traders Imperium vs The 5%ers
City Traders Imperium vs E8 Markets
City Traders Imperium vs FXIFY
City Traders Imperium vs Goat Funded Trader
City Traders Imperium vs FunderPro
City Traders Imperium vs Maven Trading
City Traders Imperium vs Funding Traders
City Traders Imperium vs OFP Funding
City Traders Imperium vs The Trading Pit
City Traders Imperium vs FTUK
FTUK vs Lux Trading Firm
Audacity Capital vs City Traders Imperium
Audacity Capital vs Lux Trading Firm
Lux Trading Firm vs The 5%ers
Lux Trading Firm vs Maven Trading
Lux Trading Firm vs OFP Funding
Lux Trading Firm vs The Trading Pit
AquaFunded vs City Traders Imperium
AquaFunded vs Lux Trading Firm
