PropFirmQuest PropFirmQuest
Side by side · verified from each firm's own pages

City Traders Imperium vs Lux Trading Firm

Rules placed next to each other, with the calculation basis written out — because two firms quoting the same percentage can be measuring completely different things.

What differs most.
  • City Traders Imperium has no consistency rule on this plan; Lux Trading Firm does.
  • Lux Trading Firm requires a stop loss on every trade; City Traders Imperium does not.
A $100,000 account, day one — one shared scale $100,000 start City Traders Imperium — 2-Step Challenge $90,000 $95,000 $110,000 Lux Trading Firm — 1-Step Evaluation $100K $94,000 $110,000
  • Account closed
  • Trading day over, account survives
  • Room to lose on day one
  • Profit still needed to pass phase one
Drawn to scale from each plan's own published numbers, on the plan compared in the table below. Day one is the only day on which every daily-loss basis agrees, which is what makes the two bars honestly comparable at all. On day one the account closes first at Lux Trading Firm — its floor sits $4,000 above the floor at City Traders Imperium. We could not confirm a daily loss limit for the Lux Trading Firm plan from the firm's own pages, so that mark is absent. That is not a claim the rule does not exist.
Lux Trading Firm logo
Lux Trading Firm
United Kingdom
Disclosure score
72 Partially documented
66 Partially documented
Challenge from$39
list, USD
£199
list, GBP
Plan compared2-Step Challenge1-Step Evaluation $100K
Model2-Step1-Step
Profit target10% → 5%10% → 10%
Daily loss limit5% of the balance recorded at day start, on balance, closed trades onlyNot yet verified
Maximum loss limit10% Static floor, from initial balance6% Static floor, from initial balance
ConsistencyNo consistency rule5% — one trade idea as a share of the profit target (Evaluation and payout)
Stop lossNot requiredMandatory
Best profit split80% Funded (start)80% Funded
Weekend holdingAllowedNot yet verified
News tradingAllowedRestricted window
Inactivity breachNot yet verifiedNot yet verified
Retroactive rule changes00
Operator jurisdictionComoros Union (Anjouan)England and Wales
Regulator disclosedNot yet verifiedNot yet verified
Restricted countriesNorth Korea, Iran, Syria, Cuba, Russia, and any individual under international sanctions (site footer, 5 named).Not yet verified
Only the first recorded plan of each firm is shown here. Full plan detail, sources and everything we could not verify are on each firm's page. Every dated record here was last re-checked against the firm's own pages on 7 September 2026.
Not yet verified is not No. Where a cell reads "Not yet verified", we could not confirm the rule from the firm's own terms or help centre. It is not a claim that the rule does not exist.

Other comparisons