PropFirmQuest PropFirmQuest
Side by side · verified from each firm's own pages

Lux Trading Firm vs Maven Trading

Rules placed next to each other, with the calculation basis written out — because two firms quoting the same percentage can be measuring completely different things.

What differs most.
  • Lux Trading Firm requires a stop loss on every trade; Maven Trading does not.
A $100,000 account, day one — one shared scale $100,000 start Lux Trading Firm — 1-Step Evaluation $100K $94,000 $110,000 Maven Trading — Two Step $92,000 $96,000 $108,000
  • Account closed
  • Room to lose before the account closes
  • Profit still needed to pass phase one
  • Trading day over, account survives
Drawn to scale from each plan's own published numbers, on the plan compared in the table below. Day one is the only day on which every daily-loss basis agrees, which is what makes the two bars honestly comparable at all. On day one the account closes first at Lux Trading Firm — its floor sits $2,000 above the floor at Maven Trading. We could not confirm a daily loss limit for the Lux Trading Firm plan from the firm's own pages, so that mark is absent. That is not a claim the rule does not exist.
Lux Trading Firm logo
Lux Trading Firm
United Kingdom
Maven Trading logo
Maven Trading
United Arab Emirates
Disclosure score
66 Partially documented
95 Fully documented
Challenge from£199
list, GBP
Not yet verified
Plan compared1-Step Evaluation $100KTwo Step
Model1-Step2-Step
Profit target10% → 10%8% → 5%
Daily loss limitNot yet verified4% of the higher of opening balance or opening equity, on equity, including floating P/L. Resets 00:00 UTC
Maximum loss limit6% Static floor, from initial balance8% Static floor, from initial balance
Consistency5% — one trade idea as a share of the profit target (Evaluation and payout)50% — best day as a share of total profit (Payout eligibility)
Stop lossMandatoryNot required
Best profit split80% Funded80% Funded
Weekend holdingNot yet verifiedAllowed
News tradingRestricted windowRestricted window
Inactivity breachNot yet verified30 days
Retroactive rule changes00
Operator jurisdictionEngland and WalesUnited Arab Emirates — DIEZ free zone
Regulator disclosedNot yet verifiedNot yet verified
Restricted countriesNot yet verifiedAfghanistan, Belarus, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Central African Republic, Congo Republic, Cuba, Eritrea, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Guyana, Haiti, Iran, Mali, North Korea, Russia, Saint Lucia, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, Sudan, Ukraine, Vanuatu, Venezuela, Yemen (site footer, 25 named). MetaTrader not available to the United States or Canada.
Only the first recorded plan of each firm is shown here. Full plan detail, sources and everything we could not verify are on each firm's page. Every dated record here was last re-checked against the firm's own pages on 7 September 2026.
Not yet verified is not No. Where a cell reads "Not yet verified", we could not confirm the rule from the firm's own terms or help centre. It is not a claim that the rule does not exist.

Other comparisons