PropFirmQuest PropFirmQuest
Side by side · verified from each firm's own pages

Lux Trading Firm vs OFP Funding

Rules placed next to each other, with the calculation basis written out — because two firms quoting the same percentage can be measuring completely different things.

What differs most.
  • OFP Funding has no consistency rule on this plan; Lux Trading Firm does.
  • Lux Trading Firm requires a stop loss on every trade; OFP Funding does not.
A $100,000 account, day one — one shared scale $100,000 start Lux Trading Firm — 1-Step Evaluation $100K $94,000 $110,000 OFP Funding — Instant Lite $95,000 $97,000
  • Account closed
  • Room to lose before the account closes
  • Profit still needed to pass phase one
  • Trading day over, account survives
Drawn to scale from each plan's own published numbers, on the plan compared in the table below. Day one is the only day on which every daily-loss basis agrees, which is what makes the two bars honestly comparable at all. On day one the account closes first at OFP Funding — its floor sits $1,000 above the floor at Lux Trading Firm. We could not confirm a daily loss limit for the Lux Trading Firm plan from the firm's own pages, so that mark is absent. That is not a claim the rule does not exist. This plan at OFP Funding has no profit target on phase one, as the firm states, so no line is drawn for it.
Lux Trading Firm logo
Lux Trading Firm
United Kingdom
OFP Funding logo
OFP Funding
Saint Lucia
Disclosure score
66 Partially documented
83 Well documented
Challenge from£199
list, GBP
$150
list, USD
Plan compared1-Step Evaluation $100KInstant Lite
Model1-StepInstant
Profit target10% → 10%Not yet verified
Daily loss limitNot yet verified3% of the previous day’s closing balance, on equity, including floating P/L. Resets 00:00 GMT+2 (DST-adjusted)
Maximum loss limit6% Static floor, from initial balance5% Static floor, from initial balance. Resets after a payout
Consistency5% — one trade idea as a share of the profit target (Evaluation and payout)No consistency rule
Stop lossMandatoryNot required
Best profit split80% Funded80% Monthly
Weekend holdingNot yet verifiedNot yet verified
News tradingRestricted windowAllowed
Inactivity breachNot yet verifiedNot yet verified
Retroactive rule changes00
Operator jurisdictionEngland and WalesSaint Lucia
Regulator disclosedNot yet verifiedNot yet verified
Restricted countriesNot yet verifiedNot yet verified
Only the first recorded plan of each firm is shown here. Full plan detail, sources and everything we could not verify are on each firm's page. Every dated record here was last re-checked against the firm's own pages on 7 September 2026.
Not yet verified is not No. Where a cell reads "Not yet verified", we could not confirm the rule from the firm's own terms or help centre. It is not a claim that the rule does not exist.

Other comparisons