Side by side · verified from each firm's own pages

FundedNext vs Funding Traders

Rules placed next to each other, with the calculation basis written out — because two firms quoting the same percentage can be measuring completely different things.

What differs most.

They calculate the daily loss limit from different reference points, so the percentages are not directly comparable.
One uses a Static floor maximum loss, the other Trailing, intraday.
FundedNext has no consistency rule on this plan; Funding Traders does.

Account closed
Trading day over, account survives
Room to lose on day one
Profit still needed to pass phase one

Drawn to scale from each plan's own published numbers, on the plan compared in the table below. Day one is the only day on which every daily-loss basis agrees, which is what makes the two bars honestly comparable at all. Both maximum-loss floors sit at the same place on day one, $90,000. The two daily-loss floors are measured from different reference points, so they only line up on day one. From day two they move apart. Funding Traders uses a trailing maximum-loss floor: the bar shows where it sits on day one, and it rises with your peak without ever coming back down.

	FundedNext United Arab Emirates	Funding Traders United States
Disclosure score	Partially documented	Well documented
Challenge from	$59.99 list, USD	$49 list, USD
Plan compared	Stellar 2-Step	1-Step Pro
Model	2-Step	1-Step
Profit target	8% → 5%	10%
Daily loss limit	5% of initial balance, on equity, including floating P/L. Resets 00:00 server time	3% of the balance recorded at day start, on balance or equity
Maximum loss limit	10% Static floor, from initial balance	10% Trailing, intraday, from the highest end-of-day balance
Consistency	No consistency rule	50% — best day as a share of total profit (Payout eligibility)
Stop loss	Not yet verified	Not required
Best profit split	95% 95% Add-On	90% Default
Weekend holding	Not yet verified	Not yet verified
News trading	Not yet verified	Restricted window
Inactivity breach	60 days	Not yet verified
Retroactive rule changes	0	0
Operator jurisdiction	United Arab Emirates (Ajman Free Zone)	Florida, United States
Regulator disclosed	Not yet verified	Not yet verified
Restricted countries	Terms of Service 5.3 (5 May 2026, Tier A) — 'Restricted Countries – CFDs', 20 named: Bangladesh, Myanmar, Belarus, North Korea, Syria, Grenada, Chad, Malaysia, Belize, Antigua and Barbuda, Cape Verde, Tuvalu, Vietnam, Bouvet Island, Burundi, Cook Islands, Eritrea, Comoros, Sri Lanka, Fiji. The trading-objectives page (Tier B) lists only five (North Korea, Myanmar, Belarus, Iran, Russia) — a shorter, different list; both are recorded and the contract governs. Note Comoros itself is on the list while an affiliated entity is registered there.	Afghanistan, Kazakhstan, Mongolia, Morocco, Poland, Taiwan, Ukraine, Venezuela, Central African Republic, North Korea, Congo, Zaire, Iran, Iraq, Libya, Mali, Saipan, Somalia, South Sudan, Yemen, Ontario (Canada), Myanmar (site footer, 22 named). MT5 not offered to US citizens or residents.

Only the first recorded plan of each firm is shown here. Full plan detail, sources and everything we could not verify are on each firm's page. Last verified 7 September 2026.

Not yet verified is not No. Where a cell reads "Not yet verified", we could not confirm the rule from the firm's own terms or help centre. It is not a claim that the rule does not exist.

FundedNext vs Funding Traders

Other comparisons