PropFirmQuest PropFirmQuest
Side by side · verified from each firm's own pages

FundedNext vs Hola Prime

Rules placed next to each other, with the calculation basis written out — because two firms quoting the same percentage can be measuring completely different things.

What differs most.
  • They calculate the daily loss limit from different reference points, so the percentages are not directly comparable.
  • FundedNext has no consistency rule on this plan; Hola Prime does.
A $100,000 account, day one — one shared scale $100,000 start FundedNext — Stellar 2-Step $90,000 $95,000 $108,000 Hola Prime — 1-Step Prime $94,000 $97,000 $110,000
  • Account closed
  • Trading day over, account survives
  • Room to lose on day one
  • Profit still needed to pass phase one
Drawn to scale from each plan's own published numbers, on the plan compared in the table below. Day one is the only day on which every daily-loss basis agrees, which is what makes the two bars honestly comparable at all. On day one the account closes first at Hola Prime — its floor sits $4,000 above the floor at FundedNext. The two daily-loss floors are measured from different reference points, so they only line up on day one. From day two they move apart.
FundedNext logo
FundedNext
United Arab Emirates
Hola Prime logo
Hola Prime
Hong Kong
Disclosure score
69 Partially documented
79 Well documented
Challenge from$59.99
list, USD
Not yet verified
Plan comparedStellar 2-Step1-Step Prime
Model2-Step1-Step
Profit target8% → 5%10%
Daily loss limit5% of initial balance, on equity, including floating P/L. Resets 00:00 server time3% of the previous day’s closing balance, on balance or equity
Maximum loss limit10% Static floor, from initial balance6% Static floor, from initial balance
ConsistencyNo consistency rule40% — best day as a share of total profit (Payout eligibility)
Stop lossNot yet verifiedMandatory
Best profit split95% 95% Add-On95% Monthly
Weekend holdingNot yet verifiedAllowed
News tradingNot yet verifiedAllowed
Inactivity breach60 days30 days
Retroactive rule changes00
Operator jurisdictionUnited Arab Emirates (Ajman Free Zone)Hong Kong
Regulator disclosedNot yet verifiedFSC Mauritius GB24203729
Restricted countriesTerms of Service 5.3 (5 May 2026, Tier A) — 'Restricted Countries – CFDs', 20 named: Bangladesh, Myanmar, Belarus, North Korea, Syria, Grenada, Chad, Malaysia, Belize, Antigua and Barbuda, Cape Verde, Tuvalu, Vietnam, Bouvet Island, Burundi, Cook Islands, Eritrea, Comoros, Sri Lanka, Fiji. The trading-objectives page (Tier B) lists only five (North Korea, Myanmar, Belarus, Iran, Russia) — a shorter, different list; both are recorded and the contract governs. Note Comoros itself is on the list while an affiliated entity is registered there.Afghanistan, Belarus, Burundi, China, Cuba, Congo, Sudan, Sri Lanka, North Korea, Yemen
Only the first recorded plan of each firm is shown here. Full plan detail, sources and everything we could not verify are on each firm's page. Every dated record here was last re-checked against the firm's own pages on 5 September 2026.
Not yet verified is not No. Where a cell reads "Not yet verified", we could not confirm the rule from the firm's own terms or help centre. It is not a claim that the rule does not exist.

Other comparisons