PropFirmQuest PropFirmQuest
Side by side · verified from each firm's own pages

FundingPips vs FXIFY

Rules placed next to each other, with the calculation basis written out — because two firms quoting the same percentage can be measuring completely different things.

What differs most.
  • They calculate the daily loss limit from different reference points, so the percentages are not directly comparable.
  • One uses a Static floor maximum loss, the other Trailing, intraday.
A $100,000 account, day one — one shared scale $100,000 start FundingPips — 2 Step Standard $90,000 $95,000 $108,000 FXIFY — Two Phase $90,000 $96,000 $110,000
  • Account closed
  • Trading day over, account survives
  • Room to lose on day one
  • Profit still needed to pass phase one
Drawn to scale from each plan's own published numbers, on the plan compared in the table below. Day one is the only day on which every daily-loss basis agrees, which is what makes the two bars honestly comparable at all. Both maximum-loss floors sit at the same place on day one, $90,000. The two daily-loss floors are measured from different reference points, so they only line up on day one. From day two they move apart. FXIFY uses a trailing maximum-loss floor: the bar shows where it sits on day one, and it rises with your peak without ever coming back down.
FundingPips logo
FundingPips
Comoros Union
FXIFY logo
FXIFY
Mauritius
Disclosure score
100 Fully documented
60 Partially documented
Challenge from$29
stated floor
Not yet verified
Plan compared2 Step StandardTwo Phase
Model2-Step2-Step
Profit target8% → 5%10% → 5%
Daily loss limit5% of the higher of opening balance or opening equity, on equity, including floating P/L. Resets 00:00 Platform Time (UTC+3)4% of the previous day’s closing balance
Maximum loss limit10% Static floor, from initial balance10% Trailing, intraday, from the highest equity reached
Consistency35% — best day as a share of total profit (Payout eligibility)Not yet verified
Stop lossNot requiredNot yet verified
Best profit split100% MonthlyNot yet verified
Weekend holdingTemporarily not allowedNot yet verified
News tradingRestricted windowNot yet verified
Inactivity breach30 days60 days
Retroactive rule changes00
Operator jurisdictionComoros UnionMauritius
Regulator disclosedComoros — IBC Regulation Act 2014 Bfx2024004Financial Services Commission, Mauritius GB24204066
Restricted countriesFATF and EU/UN sanctions list countries, Vietnam, United Arab EmiratesUnited States, Zimbabwe, Iran, Iraq, North Korea, Somalia, Vietnam, Burundi, Central African Republic, Ivory Coast, Liberia, Libya, Sudan, Cuba, Syria, Afghanistan, Yemen, Palestine, Myanmar, Nicaragua, Congo Republic, Crimea, Democratic Republic of Congo, Eritrea, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Papua New Guinea, South Sudan, Vanuatu, Venezuela, Algeria, Russia, Belarus, Kenya, Ghana (site footer, 35 named, 'including').
Only the first recorded plan of each firm is shown here. Full plan detail, sources and everything we could not verify are on each firm's page. Last re-checked 7 September 2026; the oldest record on this page was checked 4 September 2026. Each firm page carries its own date.
Not yet verified is not No. Where a cell reads "Not yet verified", we could not confirm the rule from the firm's own terms or help centre. It is not a claim that the rule does not exist.

Other comparisons