PropFirmQuest PropFirmQuest
Side by side · verified from each firm's own pages

City Traders Imperium vs FXIFY

Rules placed next to each other, with the calculation basis written out — because two firms quoting the same percentage can be measuring completely different things.

What differs most.
  • They calculate the daily loss limit from different reference points, so the percentages are not directly comparable.
  • One uses a Static floor maximum loss, the other Trailing, intraday.
A $100,000 account, day one — one shared scale $100,000 start City Traders Imperium — 2-Step Challenge $90,000 $95,000 $110,000 FXIFY — Two Phase $90,000 $96,000 $110,000
  • Account closed
  • Trading day over, account survives
  • Room to lose on day one
  • Profit still needed to pass phase one
Drawn to scale from each plan's own published numbers, on the plan compared in the table below. Day one is the only day on which every daily-loss basis agrees, which is what makes the two bars honestly comparable at all. Both maximum-loss floors sit at the same place on day one, $90,000. The two daily-loss floors are measured from different reference points, so they only line up on day one. From day two they move apart. FXIFY uses a trailing maximum-loss floor: the bar shows where it sits on day one, and it rises with your peak without ever coming back down.
FXIFY logo
FXIFY
Mauritius
Disclosure score
72 Partially documented
60 Partially documented
Challenge from$39
list, USD
Not yet verified
Plan compared2-Step ChallengeTwo Phase
Model2-Step2-Step
Profit target10% → 5%10% → 5%
Daily loss limit5% of the balance recorded at day start, on balance, closed trades only4% of the previous day’s closing balance
Maximum loss limit10% Static floor, from initial balance10% Trailing, intraday, from the highest equity reached
ConsistencyNo consistency ruleNot yet verified
Stop lossNot requiredNot yet verified
Best profit split80% Funded (start)Not yet verified
Weekend holdingAllowedNot yet verified
News tradingAllowedNot yet verified
Inactivity breachNot yet verified60 days
Retroactive rule changes00
Operator jurisdictionComoros Union (Anjouan)Mauritius
Regulator disclosedNot yet verifiedFinancial Services Commission, Mauritius GB24204066
Restricted countriesNorth Korea, Iran, Syria, Cuba, Russia, and any individual under international sanctions (site footer, 5 named).United States, Zimbabwe, Iran, Iraq, North Korea, Somalia, Vietnam, Burundi, Central African Republic, Ivory Coast, Liberia, Libya, Sudan, Cuba, Syria, Afghanistan, Yemen, Palestine, Myanmar, Nicaragua, Congo Republic, Crimea, Democratic Republic of Congo, Eritrea, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Papua New Guinea, South Sudan, Vanuatu, Venezuela, Algeria, Russia, Belarus, Kenya, Ghana (site footer, 35 named, 'including').
Only the first recorded plan of each firm is shown here. Full plan detail, sources and everything we could not verify are on each firm's page. Last verified 7 September 2026.
Not yet verified is not No. Where a cell reads "Not yet verified", we could not confirm the rule from the firm's own terms or help centre. It is not a claim that the rule does not exist.

Other comparisons