PropFirmQuest PropFirmQuest
Side by side · verified from each firm's own pages

Funding Traders vs FXIFY

Rules placed next to each other, with the calculation basis written out — because two firms quoting the same percentage can be measuring completely different things.

What differs most.
  • They calculate the daily loss limit from different reference points, so the percentages are not directly comparable.
A $100,000 account, day one — one shared scale $100,000 start Funding Traders — 1-Step Pro $90,000 $97,000 $110,000 FXIFY — Two Phase $90,000 $96,000 $110,000
  • Account closed
  • Trading day over, account survives
  • Room to lose on day one
  • Profit still needed to pass phase one
Drawn to scale from each plan's own published numbers, on the plan compared in the table below. Day one is the only day on which every daily-loss basis agrees, which is what makes the two bars honestly comparable at all. Both maximum-loss floors sit at the same place on day one, $90,000. The two daily-loss floors are measured from different reference points, so they only line up on day one. From day two they move apart. Funding Traders uses a trailing maximum-loss floor: the bar shows where it sits on day one, and it rises with your peak without ever coming back down. FXIFY uses a trailing maximum-loss floor: the bar shows where it sits on day one, and it rises with your peak without ever coming back down.
Funding Traders logo
Funding Traders
United States
FXIFY logo
FXIFY
Mauritius
Disclosure score
83 Well documented
60 Partially documented
Challenge from$49
list, USD
Not yet verified
Plan compared1-Step ProTwo Phase
Model1-Step2-Step
Profit target10%10% → 5%
Daily loss limit3% of the balance recorded at day start, on balance or equity4% of the previous day’s closing balance
Maximum loss limit10% Trailing, intraday, from the highest end-of-day balance10% Trailing, intraday, from the highest equity reached
Consistency50% — best day as a share of total profit (Payout eligibility)Not yet verified
Stop lossNot requiredNot yet verified
Best profit split90% DefaultNot yet verified
Weekend holdingNot yet verifiedNot yet verified
News tradingRestricted windowNot yet verified
Inactivity breachNot yet verified60 days
Retroactive rule changes00
Operator jurisdictionFlorida, United StatesMauritius
Regulator disclosedNot yet verifiedFinancial Services Commission, Mauritius GB24204066
Restricted countriesAfghanistan, Kazakhstan, Mongolia, Morocco, Poland, Taiwan, Ukraine, Venezuela, Central African Republic, North Korea, Congo, Zaire, Iran, Iraq, Libya, Mali, Saipan, Somalia, South Sudan, Yemen, Ontario (Canada), Myanmar (site footer, 22 named). MT5 not offered to US citizens or residents.United States, Zimbabwe, Iran, Iraq, North Korea, Somalia, Vietnam, Burundi, Central African Republic, Ivory Coast, Liberia, Libya, Sudan, Cuba, Syria, Afghanistan, Yemen, Palestine, Myanmar, Nicaragua, Congo Republic, Crimea, Democratic Republic of Congo, Eritrea, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Papua New Guinea, South Sudan, Vanuatu, Venezuela, Algeria, Russia, Belarus, Kenya, Ghana (site footer, 35 named, 'including').
Only the first recorded plan of each firm is shown here. Full plan detail, sources and everything we could not verify are on each firm's page. Last verified 7 September 2026.
Not yet verified is not No. Where a cell reads "Not yet verified", we could not confirm the rule from the firm's own terms or help centre. It is not a claim that the rule does not exist.

Other comparisons