PropFirmQuest PropFirmQuest
Side by side · verified from each firm's own pages

FTMO vs FundingPips

Rules placed next to each other, with the calculation basis written out — because two firms quoting the same percentage can be measuring completely different things.

What differs most.
  • They calculate the daily loss limit from different reference points, so the percentages are not directly comparable.
  • FTMO has no consistency rule on this plan; FundingPips does.
FTMO logo
FTMO
Czech Republic
FundingPips logo
FundingPips
Comoros Union
Disclosure score
70 Partially documented
100 Fully documented
Challenge from€89
list, EUR
$29
stated floor
Plan comparedFTMO Challenge: 2-Step2 Step Standard
Model2-Step2-Step
Profit target10% → 5%8% → 5%
Daily loss limit5% of the balance recorded at day start, on equity, including floating P/L. Resets 00:00 CE(S)T5% of the higher of opening balance or opening equity, on equity, including floating P/L. Resets 00:00 Platform Time (UTC+3)
Maximum loss limit10% Static floor, from initial balance10% Static floor, from initial balance
ConsistencyNo consistency rule35% — best day as a share of total profit (Payout eligibility)
Stop lossNot disclosedNot required
Best profit split90% Standard100% Monthly
Weekend holdingNot disclosedTemporarily not allowed
News tradingNot disclosedRestricted window
Inactivity breachNot disclosed30 days
Retroactive rule changes00
Operator jurisdictionCzech RepublicComoros Union
Regulator disclosedNot disclosedComoros — IBC Regulation Act 2014 Bfx2024004
Restricted countriesNot disclosedFATF and EU/UN sanctions list countries, Vietnam, United Arab Emirates
Only the first recorded plan of each firm is shown here. Full plan detail, sources and everything we could not verify are on each firm's page. Last verified 4 September 2026.
Not disclosed is not No. Where a cell reads "Not disclosed", we could not confirm the rule from the firm's own terms or help centre. It is not a claim that the rule does not exist.

Other comparisons