Side by side · verified from each firm's own pages
FTMO vs FundingPips
Rules placed next to each other, with the calculation basis written out — because two firms quoting the same percentage can be measuring completely different things.
What differs most.
- They calculate the daily loss limit from different reference points, so the percentages are not directly comparable.
- FTMO has no consistency rule on this plan; FundingPips does.
- Account closed
- Trading day over, account survives
- Room to lose on day one
- Profit still needed to pass phase one
FTMO Czech Republic |
FundingPips Comoros Union |
|
|---|---|---|
| Disclosure score |
Partially documented |
Fully documented |
| Challenge from | €79 list, EUR | $29 stated floor |
| Plan compared | FTMO Challenge: 2-Step | 2 Step Standard |
| Model | 2-Step | 2-Step |
| Profit target | 10% → 5% | 8% → 5% |
| Daily loss limit | 5% of the balance recorded at day start, on equity, including floating P/L. Resets 00:00 CE(S)T | 5% of the higher of opening balance or opening equity, on equity, including floating P/L. Resets 00:00 Platform Time (UTC+3) |
| Maximum loss limit | 10% Static floor, from initial balance | 10% Static floor, from initial balance |
| Consistency | No consistency rule | 35% — best day as a share of total profit (Payout eligibility) |
| Stop loss | Not yet verified? | Not required |
| Best profit split | 90% Standard | 100% Monthly |
| Weekend holding | Not yet verified? | Temporarily not allowed |
| News trading | Not yet verified? | Restricted window |
| Inactivity breach | Not yet verified? | 30 days |
| Retroactive rule changes | 0 | 0 |
| Operator jurisdiction | Czech Republic | Comoros Union |
| Regulator disclosed | Not yet verified? | Comoros — IBC Regulation Act 2014 Bfx2024004 |
| Restricted countries | Not listed. The FTMO Challenge T&C (4 August 2026) define 'Restricted Jurisdictions' only as countries determined by FTMO 'at our discretion'; no list appears in the document or on the pages read. | FATF and EU/UN sanctions list countries, Vietnam, United Arab Emirates |
Only the first recorded plan of each firm is shown here. Full plan detail, sources and everything we could not verify are on each firm's page. Every dated record here was last re-checked against the firm's own pages on 4 September 2026.
Not yet verified is not No. Where a cell reads "Not yet verified", we could not confirm the rule from the firm's own terms or help centre. It is not a claim that the rule does not exist.
Other comparisons
FundingPips vs Hola Prime
FundingPips vs The 5%ers
FundingPips vs FXIFY
FundingPips vs Goat Funded Trader
FundingPips vs Maven Trading
FundingPips vs OFP Funding
FundingPips vs The Trading Pit
FundingPips vs Lux Trading Firm
FTMO vs Hola Prime
FTMO vs FundedNext
FTMO vs The 5%ers
FTMO vs FXIFY
FTMO vs Goat Funded Trader
FTMO vs FunderPro
FTMO vs Maven Trading
FTMO vs Funding Traders
FTMO vs OFP Funding
FTMO vs The Trading Pit
FTMO vs FTUK
FTMO vs Lux Trading Firm
FundedNext vs FundingPips
Alpha Capital Group vs FundingPips
Alpha Capital Group vs FTMO
E8 Markets vs FundingPips
E8 Markets vs FTMO
BrightFunded vs FundingPips
BrightFunded vs FTMO
FunderPro vs FundingPips
Blueberry Funded vs FundingPips
Blueberry Funded vs FTMO
Funding Traders vs FundingPips
City Traders Imperium vs FundingPips
City Traders Imperium vs FTMO
FTUK vs FundingPips
Audacity Capital vs FundingPips
Audacity Capital vs FTMO
AquaFunded vs FundingPips
AquaFunded vs FTMO