Side by side · verified from each firm's own pages
Audacity Capital vs FundingPips
Rules placed next to each other, with the calculation basis written out — because two firms quoting the same percentage can be measuring completely different things.
What differs most.
- They calculate the daily loss limit from different reference points, so the percentages are not directly comparable.
- Audacity Capital has no consistency rule on this plan; FundingPips does.
- Account closed
- Trading day over, account survives
- Room to lose on day one
- Profit still needed to pass phase one
Audacity Capital Comoros Union |
FundingPips Comoros Union |
|
|---|---|---|
| Disclosure score |
Well documented |
Fully documented |
| Challenge from | $49 list, USD | $29 stated floor |
| Plan compared | Ability Challenge (2 Steps) | 2 Step Standard |
| Model | 2-Step | 2-Step |
| Profit target | 10% → 5% | 8% → 5% |
| Daily loss limit | 7.5% of the higher of the previous day’s closing balance or closing equity, on balance or equity. Resets 00:00 GMT+2 (server rollover) | 5% of the higher of opening balance or opening equity, on equity, including floating P/L. Resets 00:00 Platform Time (UTC+3) |
| Maximum loss limit | 15% Static floor, from initial balance | 10% Static floor, from initial balance |
| Consistency | No consistency rule | 35% — best day as a share of total profit (Payout eligibility) |
| Stop loss | Not required | Not required |
| Best profit split | 85% Live account | 100% Monthly |
| Weekend holding | Allowed | Temporarily not allowed |
| News trading | Allowed | Restricted window |
| Inactivity breach | 180 days | 30 days |
| Retroactive rule changes | 0 | 0 |
| Operator jurisdiction | Union of Comoros (Anjouan) | Comoros Union |
| Regulator disclosed | Union of Comoros — International Brokerage and Clearing House Licence L15850/WL | Comoros — IBC Regulation Act 2014 Bfx2024004 |
| Restricted countries | Syria, Iran, North Korea 'including but not limited to' (site footer, 3 named). US residents may take part only via DXtrade where permitted. | FATF and EU/UN sanctions list countries, Vietnam, United Arab Emirates |
Only the first recorded plan of each firm is shown here. Full plan detail, sources and everything we could not verify are on each firm's page. Last re-checked 7 September 2026; the oldest record on this page was checked 4 September 2026. Each firm page carries its own date.
Not yet verified is not No. Where a cell reads "Not yet verified", we could not confirm the rule from the firm's own terms or help centre. It is not a claim that the rule does not exist.
Other comparisons
FundingPips vs Hola Prime
FundingPips vs The 5%ers
FundingPips vs FXIFY
FundingPips vs Goat Funded Trader
FundingPips vs Maven Trading
FundingPips vs OFP Funding
FundingPips vs The Trading Pit
FundingPips vs Lux Trading Firm
FTMO vs FundingPips
FundedNext vs FundingPips
Alpha Capital Group vs FundingPips
Alpha Capital Group vs Audacity Capital
E8 Markets vs FundingPips
BrightFunded vs FundingPips
FunderPro vs FundingPips
Blueberry Funded vs FundingPips
Funding Traders vs FundingPips
City Traders Imperium vs FundingPips
FTUK vs FundingPips
Audacity Capital vs Hola Prime
Audacity Capital vs FTMO
Audacity Capital vs FundedNext
Audacity Capital vs The 5%ers
Audacity Capital vs E8 Markets
Audacity Capital vs BrightFunded
Audacity Capital vs FXIFY
Audacity Capital vs Goat Funded Trader
Audacity Capital vs FunderPro
Audacity Capital vs Maven Trading
Audacity Capital vs Blueberry Funded
Audacity Capital vs Funding Traders
Audacity Capital vs OFP Funding
Audacity Capital vs City Traders Imperium
Audacity Capital vs The Trading Pit
Audacity Capital vs FTUK
Audacity Capital vs Lux Trading Firm
AquaFunded vs FundingPips
AquaFunded vs Audacity Capital