Side by side · verified from each firm's own pages
FundingPips vs The 5%ers
Rules placed next to each other, with the calculation basis written out — because two firms quoting the same percentage can be measuring completely different things.
What differs most.
- They calculate the daily loss limit from different reference points, so the percentages are not directly comparable.
 FundingPips Comoros Union |
 The 5%ers Israel |
|
|---|---|---|
| Disclosure score |
Fully documented | Not yet scored
Research in progress |
| Challenge from | $29 stated floor | Not disclosed |
| Plan compared | 2 Step Standard | High Stakes |
| Model | 2-Step | 2-Step |
| Profit target | 8% → 5% | Not disclosed |
| Daily loss limit | 5% of the higher of opening balance or opening equity, on equity, including floating P/L. Resets 00:00 Platform Time (UTC+3) | 5% of the higher of the previous day’s closing balance or closing equity, on balance or equity. Resets 00:00 server time |
| Maximum loss limit | 10% Static floor, from initial balance | 10% Static floor, from initial balance |
| Consistency | 35% — best day as a share of total profit (Payout eligibility) | Not disclosed |
| Stop loss | Not required | Not disclosed |
| Best profit split | 100% Monthly | Not disclosed |
| Weekend holding | Temporarily not allowed | Not disclosed |
| News trading | Restricted window | Not disclosed |
| Inactivity breach | 30 days | Not disclosed |
| Retroactive rule changes | 0 | 0 |
| Operator jurisdiction | Comoros Union | Not disclosed |
| Regulator disclosed | Comoros — IBC Regulation Act 2014 Bfx2024004 | Not disclosed |
| Restricted countries | FATF and EU/UN sanctions list countries, Vietnam, United Arab Emirates | Not disclosed |
Only the first recorded plan of each firm is shown here. Full plan detail, sources and everything we could not verify are on each firm's page. Last verified 4 September 2026.
Not disclosed is not No. Where a cell reads "Not disclosed", we could not confirm the rule from the firm's own terms or help centre. It is not a claim that the rule does not exist.