Side by side · verified from each firm's own pages
Audacity Capital vs Funding Traders
Rules placed next to each other, with the calculation basis written out — because two firms quoting the same percentage can be measuring completely different things.
What differs most.
- They calculate the daily loss limit from different reference points, so the percentages are not directly comparable.
- One uses a Static floor maximum loss, the other Trailing, intraday.
- Audacity Capital has no consistency rule on this plan; Funding Traders does.
- Account closed
- Trading day over, account survives
- Room to lose on day one
- Profit still needed to pass phase one
Audacity Capital Comoros Union |
Funding Traders United States |
|
|---|---|---|
| Disclosure score |
Well documented |
Well documented |
| Challenge from | $49 list, USD | $49 list, USD |
| Plan compared | Ability Challenge (2 Steps) | 1-Step Pro |
| Model | 2-Step | 1-Step |
| Profit target | 10% → 5% | 10% |
| Daily loss limit | 7.5% of the higher of the previous day’s closing balance or closing equity, on balance or equity. Resets 00:00 GMT+2 (server rollover) | 3% of the balance recorded at day start, on balance or equity |
| Maximum loss limit | 15% Static floor, from initial balance | 10% Trailing, intraday, from the highest end-of-day balance |
| Consistency | No consistency rule | 50% — best day as a share of total profit (Payout eligibility) |
| Stop loss | Not required | Not required |
| Best profit split | 85% Live account | 90% Default |
| Weekend holding | Allowed | Not yet verified? |
| News trading | Allowed | Restricted window |
| Inactivity breach | 180 days | Not yet verified? |
| Retroactive rule changes | 0 | 0 |
| Operator jurisdiction | Union of Comoros (Anjouan) | Florida, United States |
| Regulator disclosed | Union of Comoros — International Brokerage and Clearing House Licence L15850/WL | Not yet verified? |
| Restricted countries | Syria, Iran, North Korea 'including but not limited to' (site footer, 3 named). US residents may take part only via DXtrade where permitted. | Afghanistan, Kazakhstan, Mongolia, Morocco, Poland, Taiwan, Ukraine, Venezuela, Central African Republic, North Korea, Congo, Zaire, Iran, Iraq, Libya, Mali, Saipan, Somalia, South Sudan, Yemen, Ontario (Canada), Myanmar (site footer, 22 named). MT5 not offered to US citizens or residents. |
Only the first recorded plan of each firm is shown here. Full plan detail, sources and everything we could not verify are on each firm's page. Every dated record here was last re-checked against the firm's own pages on 7 September 2026.
Not yet verified is not No. Where a cell reads "Not yet verified", we could not confirm the rule from the firm's own terms or help centre. It is not a claim that the rule does not exist.
Other comparisons
FTMO vs Funding Traders
FundedNext vs Funding Traders
Alpha Capital Group vs Funding Traders
Alpha Capital Group vs Audacity Capital
E8 Markets vs Funding Traders
BrightFunded vs Funding Traders
FunderPro vs Funding Traders
Blueberry Funded vs Funding Traders
Funding Traders vs FundingPips
Funding Traders vs Hola Prime
Funding Traders vs The 5%ers
Funding Traders vs FXIFY
Funding Traders vs Goat Funded Trader
Funding Traders vs Maven Trading
Funding Traders vs OFP Funding
Funding Traders vs The Trading Pit
Funding Traders vs Lux Trading Firm
City Traders Imperium vs Funding Traders
FTUK vs Funding Traders
Audacity Capital vs FundingPips
Audacity Capital vs Hola Prime
Audacity Capital vs FTMO
Audacity Capital vs FundedNext
Audacity Capital vs The 5%ers
Audacity Capital vs E8 Markets
Audacity Capital vs BrightFunded
Audacity Capital vs FXIFY
Audacity Capital vs Goat Funded Trader
Audacity Capital vs FunderPro
Audacity Capital vs Maven Trading
Audacity Capital vs Blueberry Funded
Audacity Capital vs OFP Funding
Audacity Capital vs City Traders Imperium
Audacity Capital vs The Trading Pit
Audacity Capital vs FTUK
Audacity Capital vs Lux Trading Firm
AquaFunded vs Funding Traders
AquaFunded vs Audacity Capital