Side by side · verified from each firm's own pages

Audacity Capital vs The Trading Pit

Rules placed next to each other, with the calculation basis written out — because two firms quoting the same percentage can be measuring completely different things.

What differs most.

They calculate the daily loss limit from different reference points, so the percentages are not directly comparable.
Audacity Capital has no consistency rule on this plan; The Trading Pit does.

	Audacity Capital Comoros Union	The Trading Pit Liechtenstein
Disclosure score	Well documented	Partially documented
Challenge from	$49 list, USD	Not yet verified
Plan compared	Ability Challenge (2 Steps)	CFD Prime (1-phase / 2-phase)
Model	2-Step	2-Step
Profit target	10% → 5%	Not yet verified
Daily loss limit	7.5% of the higher of the previous day’s closing balance or closing equity, on balance or equity. Resets 00:00 GMT+2 (server rollover)	Not yet verified
Maximum loss limit	15% Static floor, from initial balance	Not yet verified
Consistency	No consistency rule	50% — best day as a share of the sum of positive days (Payout eligibility)
Stop loss	Not required	Not required
Best profit split	85% Live account	80% Earning phase
Weekend holding	Allowed	Not yet verified
News trading	Allowed	Restricted window
Inactivity breach	180 days	21 days
Retroactive rule changes	0	0
Operator jurisdiction	Union of Comoros (Anjouan)	Liechtenstein
Regulator disclosed	Union of Comoros — International Brokerage and Clearing House Licence L15850/WL	Not yet verified
Restricted countries	Syria, Iran, North Korea 'including but not limited to' (site footer, 3 named). US residents may take part only via DXtrade where permitted.	United States, Canada, Russia 'including' — the footer points to the FAQ for the full list, which has not been read.

Only the first recorded plan of each firm is shown here. Full plan detail, sources and everything we could not verify are on each firm's page. Every dated record here was last re-checked against the firm's own pages on 7 September 2026.

Not yet verified is not No. Where a cell reads "Not yet verified", we could not confirm the rule from the firm's own terms or help centre. It is not a claim that the rule does not exist.