PropFirmQuest PropFirmQuest
Side by side · verified from each firm's own pages

Funding Traders vs The 5%ers

Rules placed next to each other, with the calculation basis written out — because two firms quoting the same percentage can be measuring completely different things.

What differs most.
  • They calculate the daily loss limit from different reference points, so the percentages are not directly comparable.
  • One uses a Trailing, intraday maximum loss, the other Static floor.
A $100,000 account, day one — one shared scale $100,000 start Funding Traders — 1-Step Pro $90,000 $97,000 $110,000 The 5%ers — High Stakes $90,000 $95,000 $110,000
  • Account closed
  • Trading day over, account survives
  • Room to lose on day one
  • Profit still needed to pass phase one
Drawn to scale from each plan's own published numbers, on the plan compared in the table below. Day one is the only day on which every daily-loss basis agrees, which is what makes the two bars honestly comparable at all. Both maximum-loss floors sit at the same place on day one, $90,000. The two daily-loss floors are measured from different reference points, so they only line up on day one. From day two they move apart. Funding Traders uses a trailing maximum-loss floor: the bar shows where it sits on day one, and it rises with your peak without ever coming back down.
Funding Traders logo
Funding Traders
United States
The 5%ers logo
The 5%ers
Israel
Disclosure score
83 Well documented
68 Partially documented
Challenge from$49
list, USD
$19
list, USD
Plan compared1-Step ProHigh Stakes
Model1-Step2-Step
Profit target10%10% → 5%
Daily loss limit3% of the balance recorded at day start, on balance or equity5% of the higher of the previous day’s closing balance or closing equity, on balance or equity. Resets 00:00 server time
Maximum loss limit10% Trailing, intraday, from the highest end-of-day balance10% Static floor, from initial balance
Consistency50% — best day as a share of total profit (Payout eligibility)Not yet verified
Stop lossNot requiredNot yet verified
Best profit split90% Default80% Funded, first level
Weekend holdingNot yet verifiedAllowed
News tradingRestricted windowRestricted window
Inactivity breachNot yet verified30 days
Retroactive rule changes00
Operator jurisdictionFlorida, United StatesEngland and Wales
Regulator disclosedNot yet verifiedNot yet verified
Restricted countriesAfghanistan, Kazakhstan, Mongolia, Morocco, Poland, Taiwan, Ukraine, Venezuela, Central African Republic, North Korea, Congo, Zaire, Iran, Iraq, Libya, Mali, Saipan, Somalia, South Sudan, Yemen, Ontario (Canada), Myanmar (site footer, 22 named). MT5 not offered to US citizens or residents.Afghanistan, Belarus, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Burundi, Central African Republic, Cuba, Congo Republic, Crimea, Democratic Republic of Congo, Eritrea, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Iraq, Iran, Israel, Laos, Lebanon, Liberia, Libya, Myanmar, North Korea, Palestinian Territory, Papua New Guinea, Russia, South Sudan, Sudan, Somalia, Syria, Vanuatu, Venezuela, Yemen (31 named as 'Forbidden Territory' in the T&C, last update 16 August 2026; list is 'including but not limited to'). Note: Israel is on the list although one operating entity is registered there.
Only the first recorded plan of each firm is shown here. Full plan detail, sources and everything we could not verify are on each firm's page. Last verified 7 September 2026.
Not yet verified is not No. Where a cell reads "Not yet verified", we could not confirm the rule from the firm's own terms or help centre. It is not a claim that the rule does not exist.

Other comparisons