Side by side · verified from each firm's own pages

City Traders Imperium vs The Trading Pit

Rules placed next to each other, with the calculation basis written out — because two firms quoting the same percentage can be measuring completely different things.

What differs most.

City Traders Imperium has no consistency rule on this plan; The Trading Pit does.

	City Traders Imperium Comoros Union	The Trading Pit Liechtenstein
Disclosure score	Partially documented	Partially documented
Challenge from	$39 list, USD	Not yet verified
Plan compared	2-Step Challenge	CFD Prime (1-phase / 2-phase)
Model	2-Step	2-Step
Profit target	10% → 5%	Not yet verified
Daily loss limit	5% of the balance recorded at day start, on balance, closed trades only	Not yet verified
Maximum loss limit	10% Static floor, from initial balance	Not yet verified
Consistency	No consistency rule	50% — best day as a share of the sum of positive days (Payout eligibility)
Stop loss	Not required	Not required
Best profit split	80% Funded (start)	80% Earning phase
Weekend holding	Allowed	Not yet verified
News trading	Allowed	Restricted window
Inactivity breach	Not yet verified	21 days
Retroactive rule changes	0	0
Operator jurisdiction	Comoros Union (Anjouan)	Liechtenstein
Regulator disclosed	Not yet verified	Not yet verified
Restricted countries	North Korea, Iran, Syria, Cuba, Russia, and any individual under international sanctions (site footer, 5 named).	United States, Canada, Russia 'including' — the footer points to the FAQ for the full list, which has not been read.

Only the first recorded plan of each firm is shown here. Full plan detail, sources and everything we could not verify are on each firm's page. Every dated record here was last re-checked against the firm's own pages on 7 September 2026.

Not yet verified is not No. Where a cell reads "Not yet verified", we could not confirm the rule from the firm's own terms or help centre. It is not a claim that the rule does not exist.