PropFirmQuest PropFirmQuest
Side by side · verified from each firm's own pages

City Traders Imperium vs OFP Funding

Rules placed next to each other, with the calculation basis written out — because two firms quoting the same percentage can be measuring completely different things.

What differs most.
  • They calculate the daily loss limit from different reference points, so the percentages are not directly comparable.
A $100,000 account, day one — one shared scale $100,000 start City Traders Imperium — 2-Step Challenge $90,000 $95,000 $110,000 OFP Funding — Instant Lite $95,000 $97,000
  • Account closed
  • Trading day over, account survives
  • Room to lose on day one
  • Profit still needed to pass phase one
Drawn to scale from each plan's own published numbers, on the plan compared in the table below. Day one is the only day on which every daily-loss basis agrees, which is what makes the two bars honestly comparable at all. On day one the account closes first at OFP Funding — its floor sits $5,000 above the floor at City Traders Imperium. The two daily-loss floors are measured from different reference points, so they only line up on day one. From day two they move apart. This plan at OFP Funding has no profit target on phase one, as the firm states, so no line is drawn for it.
OFP Funding logo
OFP Funding
Saint Lucia
Disclosure score
72 Partially documented
83 Well documented
Challenge from$39
list, USD
$150
list, USD
Plan compared2-Step ChallengeInstant Lite
Model2-StepInstant
Profit target10% → 5%Not yet verified
Daily loss limit5% of the balance recorded at day start, on balance, closed trades only3% of the previous day’s closing balance, on equity, including floating P/L. Resets 00:00 GMT+2 (DST-adjusted)
Maximum loss limit10% Static floor, from initial balance5% Static floor, from initial balance. Resets after a payout
ConsistencyNo consistency ruleNo consistency rule
Stop lossNot requiredNot required
Best profit split80% Funded (start)80% Monthly
Weekend holdingAllowedNot yet verified
News tradingAllowedAllowed
Inactivity breachNot yet verifiedNot yet verified
Retroactive rule changes00
Operator jurisdictionComoros Union (Anjouan)Saint Lucia
Regulator disclosedNot yet verifiedNot yet verified
Restricted countriesNorth Korea, Iran, Syria, Cuba, Russia, and any individual under international sanctions (site footer, 5 named).Not yet verified
Only the first recorded plan of each firm is shown here. Full plan detail, sources and everything we could not verify are on each firm's page. Last verified 7 September 2026.
Not yet verified is not No. Where a cell reads "Not yet verified", we could not confirm the rule from the firm's own terms or help centre. It is not a claim that the rule does not exist.

Other comparisons