Side by side · verified from each firm's own pages

OFP Funding vs The Trading Pit

Rules placed next to each other, with the calculation basis written out — because two firms quoting the same percentage can be measuring completely different things.

What differs most.

They calculate the daily loss limit from different reference points, so the percentages are not directly comparable.
OFP Funding has no consistency rule on this plan; The Trading Pit does.

	OFP Funding Saint Lucia	The Trading Pit Liechtenstein
Disclosure score	Well documented	Partially documented
Challenge from	$150 list, USD	Not yet verified
Plan compared	Instant Lite	CFD Prime (1-phase / 2-phase)
Model	Instant	2-Step
Profit target	Not yet verified	Not yet verified
Daily loss limit	3% of the previous day’s closing balance, on equity, including floating P/L. Resets 00:00 GMT+2 (DST-adjusted)	Not yet verified
Maximum loss limit	5% Static floor, from initial balance. Resets after a payout	Not yet verified
Consistency	No consistency rule	50% — best day as a share of the sum of positive days (Payout eligibility)
Stop loss	Not required	Not required
Best profit split	80% Monthly	80% Earning phase
Weekend holding	Not yet verified	Not yet verified
News trading	Allowed	Restricted window
Inactivity breach	Not yet verified	21 days
Retroactive rule changes	0	0
Operator jurisdiction	Saint Lucia	Liechtenstein
Regulator disclosed	Not yet verified	Not yet verified
Restricted countries	Not yet verified	United States, Canada, Russia 'including' — the footer points to the FAQ for the full list, which has not been read.

Only the first recorded plan of each firm is shown here. Full plan detail, sources and everything we could not verify are on each firm's page. Every dated record here was last re-checked against the firm's own pages on 7 September 2026.

Not yet verified is not No. Where a cell reads "Not yet verified", we could not confirm the rule from the firm's own terms or help centre. It is not a claim that the rule does not exist.