PropFirmQuest PropFirmQuest
Side by side · verified from each firm's own pages

BrightFunded vs Hola Prime

Rules placed next to each other, with the calculation basis written out — because two firms quoting the same percentage can be measuring completely different things.

What differs most.
  • They calculate the daily loss limit from different reference points, so the percentages are not directly comparable.
  • BrightFunded has no consistency rule on this plan; Hola Prime does.
BrightFunded logo
BrightFunded
United Arab Emirates
Hola Prime logo
Hola Prime
Hong Kong
Disclosure score
75 Well documented
79 Well documented
Challenge fromNot yet verifiedNot yet verified
Plan compared2-Step Bright1-Step Prime
Model2-Step1-Step
Profit target8% → 5%10%
Daily loss limit4% of initial balance, on balance or equity. Resets 23:30–23:59 CET rollover window3% of the previous day’s closing balance, on balance or equity
Maximum loss limit8% Static floor, from initial balance6% Static floor, from initial balance
ConsistencyNo consistency rule40% — best day as a share of total profit (Payout eligibility)
Stop lossNot yet verifiedMandatory
Best profit split90% With 90% add-on95% Monthly
Weekend holdingNot yet verifiedAllowed
News tradingNot yet verifiedAllowed
Inactivity breachNot yet verified30 days
Retroactive rule changes00
Operator jurisdictionDubai, United Arab EmiratesHong Kong
Regulator disclosedNot yet verifiedFSC Mauritius GB24203729
Restricted countriesCuba, Iran, North Korea, Syria, Vietnam (T&C, clause 2). MetaTrader 5 products additionally not offered to residents of the United States and the United Arab Emirates.Afghanistan, Belarus, Burundi, China, Cuba, Congo, Sudan, Sri Lanka, North Korea, Yemen
Only the first recorded plan of each firm is shown here. Full plan detail, sources and everything we could not verify are on each firm's page. Last verified 6 September 2026.
Not yet verified is not No. Where a cell reads "Not yet verified", we could not confirm the rule from the firm's own terms or help centre. It is not a claim that the rule does not exist.

Other comparisons