The Trading Pit
Disclosure score 67/100 — Partially documented. This measures how much The Trading Pit publishes about its own rules on the pages we have verified. It is not a judgement of whether the firm is good, and a low score can simply mean we have not read enough of its site yet.
The Trading Pit is partially documented at 67/100: 4 of 9 criteria published in full, 3 in part, and 2 not found on the pages we read. If you are choosing on soft-breach rules or regulator or licence, read the firm's own pages before you pay.
Published in full
- Consistency rule formula published12/12
- Payout terms fully specified15/15
- Legal entity identified10/10
- Rule changes dated and traceable7/7
Published in part
- Maximum loss limit fully specified8/15
- Daily loss limit fully specified11/15
- Restricted countries named4/8
Not found on the pages we read
- Soft-breach rules disclosed0/10
- Regulator or licence disclosed0/8
Not found is not "does not exist" — it is where our reading stopped.
Why you can trust this page
Every figure comes from The Trading Pit's own terms, rules or help pages (Tier B) or a legal document or register (Tier A); nothing from aggregators or review sites is used to state a fact. The score is nine published criteria with nine published weights — recompute it from the table below. Outbound links may earn a referral fee; they cannot move a score, a rank, or a word on this page.
How the 67/100 breaks down
Every weight is published. Add the right-hand column and you get the score — no hidden weighting, no editorial adjustment. If you disagree with a line, you can say exactly which one.
| Criterion | Weight | Awarded | What it means here |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily loss limit fully specified | 15 | 11 | Percentage, basis, whether it is measured on balance or equity, and the reset time. All four, or partial credit. |
| Maximum loss limit fully specified | 15 | 8 | Percentage, static or trailing, and the reference point it trails from. |
| Consistency rule formula published | 12 | 12 | The formula, not just the percentage. An explicit “no consistency rule” scores full marks. |
| Payout terms fully specified | 15 | 15 | Split, frequency, profitable-day requirements and minimum amounts, for every cycle offered. |
| Soft-breach rules disclosed | 10 | 0 | Profit deductions, warning systems and split reductions that cost money without closing the account. |
| Legal entity identified | 10 | 10 | Entity name, jurisdiction and company registration number. |
| Regulator or licence disclosed | 8 | 0 | A named regulator and licence number, or a clear statement that there is none. |
| Restricted countries named | 8 | 4 | The actual list, not a generic clause about unlawful jurisdictions. |
| Rule changes dated and traceable | 7 | 7 | Changes carry effective dates and state whether existing accounts are affected. |
| Total | 100 | 67 |
Plans and rules
Objectives
Drawdown
Risk rules
Payout
Permissions
Execution
Source: thetradingpit.com/trading-rules Tier B MEDIUM verified 2026-09-07
Rule change history
-
Effective 2026-07-06Consistency New accounts only CFD 1-phase $100K and $200K
- Before
- 3 profitable trading days of 0.5%
- After
- 3 trading days (profitable or not) plus a 50% consistency rule on positive days' profit
Scoped to accounts created from 6 July 2026; earlier accounts keep the profitable-days rule.
Source: thetradingpit.com/cfds-prop-trading Tier B MEDIUM
-
Effective 2026-03-05Trading rules New accounts only All CFD account types
- Before
- 5 minimum trading days in addition to profitable days
- After
- Minimum-days requirement dropped for accounts created after 5 March 2026
Accounts created until 5 March 2026 still need 5 trading days.
Source: thetradingpit.com/cfds-prop-trading Tier B MEDIUM
-
Effective 2025-06-02Payout New accounts only All CFD account types
- Before
- No profitable-days requirement
- After
- 3 profitable days of at least 0.5% of initial balance, measured on min(midnight balance, midnight equity) − previous day balance
Applies to accounts purchased or upgraded on or after 2 June 2025.
Source: thetradingpit.com/trading-rules Tier B HIGH
Who you are actually contracting with
Most firms split the simulated-trading operator from the execution entity. Which entity you face can depend on the platform you pick, and that changes your counterparty risk. Nobody else puts this in a comparison.
- Jurisdiction
- Liechtenstein
- Reg. no.
- FL-0002.693.417-1
- Regulator
- Not yet verified?
Heiligkreuz 6, 9490 Vaduz. Part of a group: The Trading Pit AG (holding, FL-0002.688.743-6), The Trading Pit Champions GmbH (platform services, FL-0002.693.413-9), The Trading Pit Limited (Cyprus, HE 431291, business and administration services). No regulator or licence named for any of them.
Alternatives with a 2-Step plan

Sources, and what we could not verify
| Source | Tier | Confidence | Covers | Dated |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| thetradingpit.com/trading-rules | Tier B | HIGH | CFD Prime and Classic rule structure: daily drawdown recalculated from balance at 16:15 CT, static max loss on Prime, 3 profitable days of 0.5% with the formula min(midnight balance, midnight equity) − previous day balance for accounts from 2 June 2025, 21-day inactivity, news prohibited ±2 minutes on $100K/$200K CFD accounts, profit target in one trade prohibited, gambling rule with lot-size consistency, 40% consistency on Classic, copy-trading limits, four entities. No percentages on this page. | Not yet verified? |
| thetradingpit.com/cfds-prop-trading | Tier B | MEDIUM | Rewards policy: 80% share, payouts every 14 days above $100; three dated rule changes (2 June 2025, 5 March 2026, 6 July 2026) each scoped by account creation date; Classic earning-phase ladder (10%/8% targets, 4% daily, 7% trailing on highest equity, 50–80% share by level); Instant rewards policy (30% consistency, cap of $2,500 or 50% of profit per payout); instrument list, commissions, leverage. Anomaly: the Prime challenge percentages (target, daily, max) are rendered by a JavaScript configurator and were not captured. | No usable date |
Not verified
Prime challenge percentages— Profit target, daily and maximum drawdown for the 1-phase and 2-phase Prime CFD challenges sit in a JavaScript order summary; only the rule mechanics were readable.Restricted countries— Footer names three and defers to a FAQ not yet read.Regulator— No statement either way for any of the four group companies.Daily drawdown measurement— Recalculated from balance at 16:15 CT; whether the breach is on equity or balance during the day is in a FAQ not yet read.Prices— In the configurator; not captured.
Terms & Conditions · Official trading rules · Official site
Logo used under nominative fair use for identification in a comparative review, taken from The Trading Pit's own site — thetradingpit.com (site logo, SVG — light wordmark). The Trading Pit does not endorse this site.
Guides that cover The Trading Pit
Static Drawdown Prop Firms: The Floor That Never Moves
31 of the 45 prop firm plans we have verified use a static drawdown. Which firms use one, where each floor actually sits, and why 8 firms se… · 9 min
Prop Firm Daily Drawdown: Balance or Equity?
Five different starting points across 45 verified prop firm plans. The same 5% daily loss limit lands $2,850 apart on a $100,000 account. He… · 10 min
Questions about The Trading Pit, answered from the record
Does The Trading Pit have a consistency rule?
Yes: 50%, defined as best day as a share of the sum of positive days (payout eligibility) on CFD Prime (1-phase / 2-phase).
Has The Trading Pit changed rules retroactively?
Not on our record. 3 rule changes logged for The Trading Pit, none applied to accounts that already existed.
What is the The Trading Pit disclosure score?
67/100, computed from nine published criteria with published weights. It measures how much The Trading Pit publishes about its own rules, not whether the firm is good.