Side by side · verified from each firm's own pages
AquaFunded vs The Trading Pit
Rules placed next to each other, with the calculation basis written out — because two firms quoting the same percentage can be measuring completely different things.
What differs most.
- They calculate the daily loss limit from different reference points, so the percentages are not directly comparable.
AquaFunded United Arab Emirates |
The Trading Pit Liechtenstein |
|
|---|---|---|
| Disclosure score |
Well documented |
Partially documented |
| Challenge from | Not yet verified? | Not yet verified? |
| Plan compared | 2 Step Standard | CFD Prime (1-phase / 2-phase) |
| Model | 2-Step | 2-Step |
| Profit target | 8% → 5% | Not yet verified? |
| Daily loss limit | 5% of the higher of opening balance or opening equity, on equity, including floating P/L. Resets 17:00 EST | Not yet verified? |
| Maximum loss limit | 8% Static floor, from initial balance | Not yet verified? |
| Consistency | Not yet verified? | 50% — best day as a share of the sum of positive days (Payout eligibility) |
| Stop loss | Not yet verified? | Not required |
| Best profit split | 90% Bi-weekly | 80% Earning phase |
| Weekend holding | Allowed | Not yet verified? |
| News trading | Restricted window | Restricted window |
| Inactivity breach | 30 days | 21 days |
| Retroactive rule changes | 0 | 0 |
| Operator jurisdiction | United Arab Emirates | Liechtenstein |
| Regulator disclosed | Not yet verified? | Not yet verified? |
| Restricted countries | Cuba, Iran, Syria, Vietnam, Kenya, Albania, Algeria, North Korea, Senegal, Myanmar, Russia, Belarus, Sudan, South Sudan, Venezuela, Crimea, Donetsk, Luhansk (18 named by the firm, help centre article dated 7 July 2026). A further nine — Thailand, Brazil, Bulgaria, Japan, Jordan, Singapore, Malaysia, Indonesia, Philippines — may trade instant-funding models only, capped at $50,000 funded per trader. | United States, Canada, Russia 'including' — the footer points to the FAQ for the full list, which has not been read. |
Only the first recorded plan of each firm is shown here. Full plan detail, sources and everything we could not verify are on each firm's page. Last re-checked 10 September 2026; the oldest record on this page was checked 7 September 2026. Each firm page carries its own date.
Not yet verified is not No. Where a cell reads "Not yet verified", we could not confirm the rule from the firm's own terms or help centre. It is not a claim that the rule does not exist.
Other comparisons
FundingPips vs The Trading Pit
Hola Prime vs The Trading Pit
FTMO vs The Trading Pit
FundedNext vs The Trading Pit
Alpha Capital Group vs The Trading Pit
Alpha Capital Group vs AquaFunded
E8 Markets vs The Trading Pit
BrightFunded vs The Trading Pit
FXIFY vs The Trading Pit
Goat Funded Trader vs The Trading Pit
FunderPro vs The Trading Pit
Maven Trading vs The Trading Pit
Blueberry Funded vs The Trading Pit
Funding Traders vs The Trading Pit
OFP Funding vs The Trading Pit
City Traders Imperium vs The Trading Pit
The Trading Pit vs The 5%ers
FTUK vs The Trading Pit
Audacity Capital vs The Trading Pit
Lux Trading Firm vs The Trading Pit
AquaFunded vs FundingPips
AquaFunded vs Hola Prime
AquaFunded vs FTMO
AquaFunded vs FundedNext
AquaFunded vs The 5%ers
AquaFunded vs E8 Markets
AquaFunded vs BrightFunded
AquaFunded vs FXIFY
AquaFunded vs Goat Funded Trader
AquaFunded vs FunderPro
AquaFunded vs Maven Trading
AquaFunded vs Blueberry Funded
AquaFunded vs Funding Traders
AquaFunded vs OFP Funding
AquaFunded vs City Traders Imperium
AquaFunded vs FTUK
AquaFunded vs Audacity Capital
AquaFunded vs Lux Trading Firm