Blueberry Funded
Disclosure score 67/100 — Partially documented. This measures how much Blueberry Funded publishes about its own rules on the pages we have verified. It is not a judgement of whether the firm is good, and a low score can simply mean we have not read enough of its site yet.
Blueberry Funded is partially documented at 67/100: 3 of 9 criteria published in full, 3 in part, and 3 not found on the pages we read. If you are choosing on soft-breach rules or regulator or licence, read the firm's own pages before you pay.
Published in full
- Maximum loss limit fully specified15/15
- Consistency rule formula published12/12
- Legal entity identified10/10
Published in part
- Daily loss limit fully specified12/15
- Payout terms fully specified13/15
- Rule changes dated and traceable5/7
Not found on the pages we read
- Soft-breach rules disclosed0/10
- Regulator or licence disclosed0/8
- Restricted countries named0/8
Not found is not "does not exist" — it is where our reading stopped.
Why you can trust this page
Every figure comes from Blueberry Funded's own terms, rules or help pages (Tier B) or a legal document or register (Tier A); nothing from aggregators or review sites is used to state a fact. The score is nine published criteria with nine published weights — recompute it from the table below. Outbound links may earn a referral fee; they cannot move a score, a rank, or a word on this page.
How the 67/100 breaks down
Every weight is published. Add the right-hand column and you get the score — no hidden weighting, no editorial adjustment. If you disagree with a line, you can say exactly which one.
| Criterion | Weight | Awarded | What it means here |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily loss limit fully specified | 15 | 12 | Percentage, basis, whether it is measured on balance or equity, and the reset time. All four, or partial credit. |
| Maximum loss limit fully specified | 15 | 15 | Percentage, static or trailing, and the reference point it trails from. |
| Consistency rule formula published | 12 | 12 | The formula, not just the percentage. An explicit “no consistency rule” scores full marks. |
| Payout terms fully specified | 15 | 13 | Split, frequency, profitable-day requirements and minimum amounts, for every cycle offered. |
| Soft-breach rules disclosed | 10 | 0 | Profit deductions, warning systems and split reductions that cost money without closing the account. |
| Legal entity identified | 10 | 10 | Entity name, jurisdiction and company registration number. |
| Regulator or licence disclosed | 8 | 0 | A named regulator and licence number, or a clear statement that there is none. |
| Restricted countries named | 8 | 0 | The actual list, not a generic clause about unlawful jurisdictions. |
| Rule changes dated and traceable | 7 | 5 | Changes carry effective dates and state whether existing accounts are affected. |
| Total | 100 | 67 |
Plans and rules
Objectives
Drawdown
Risk rules
Payout
Permissions
Execution
Source: blueberryfunded.com/ (pricing widget) Tier B MEDIUM verified 2026-09-07
Objectives
Drawdown
Risk rules
Payout
Permissions
Execution
Source: blueberryfunded.com/ (pricing widget) Tier B MEDIUM verified 2026-09-07
Objectives
Drawdown
Risk rules
Payout
Permissions
Execution
Source: blueberryfunded.com/ (pricing widget) Tier B MEDIUM verified 2026-09-07
Rule change history
-
Effective 2026-03-12Risk rules New accounts only 2-Step (Legacy) — Funded Accounts
- Before
- Lot-size restriction rule by asset class and account size; no risk-per-trade-idea rule
- After
- Flat 1.5% risk per trade idea from initial size on funded accounts; lot-size rule withdrawn; new prohibited-strategies and anti-gambling texts
Accounts bought before 12 March 2026 keep the old ruleset, and the help centre keeps the old articles online under a 'pre-March 12th' label — a clean, dated cutoff.
Source: help.blueberryfunded.com/en/articles/12076385-legacy-2-step-challenge-complete-guide Tier B HIGH
Who you are actually contracting with
Most firms split the simulated-trading operator from the execution entity. Which entity you face can depend on the platform you pick, and that changes your counterparty risk. Nobody else puts this in a comparison.
- Jurisdiction
- Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
- Reg. no.
- 2090 LLC 2022
- Regulator
- Not yet verified?
Site footer: Euro House, Richmond Hill Road, Kingstown VC0100. Describes itself as backed by the broker Blueberry Markets; no regulator or licence is named for the prop firm entity.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia (implied by Pty Ltd)
- Reg. no.
- Not yet verified?
- Regulator
- Not yet verified?
Named in the footer as facilitating treasury services. Jurisdiction inferred from the company suffix, not stated.
Alternatives with a 2-Step plan
Sources, and what we could not verify
| Source | Tier | Confidence | Covers | Dated |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| blueberryfunded.com/ (pricing widget and footer) | Tier B | MEDIUM | Current line-up and rules per plan: Flex 1 Step (12% target, 3% daily, 12% max, 85% split, 1% risk per trade idea), 1-Step (10%, 4%, 6%, 80%, 1.5% funded), Prime 2-Step (8% then 6%, 4% daily, 10% static, 80%, no risk-per-trade rule), Instant Elite, Instant Lite, Synthetic; daily loss = higher of previous-day equity or balance; 14-day payout cycle with 7-day and on-demand add-ons; leverage; entity and treasury company. Anomaly: the help-centre 2-Step guide (10% then 5%, 5% daily) is filed as Legacy and no longer matches the product sold as Prime 2-Step. | No usable date |
| help.blueberryfunded.com/en/articles/12076385-legacy-2-step-challenge-complete-guide | Tier B | HIGH | Legacy 2-Step: full parameter table, daily reset at 5:00 PM EST on the higher of start-of-day balance or equity, static 10% max, 3 active days of 0.5%, 80% split every 14 days with $100 minimum, 1.5% risk per trade idea on funded accounts from 12 March 2026, 10-minute same-idea window, 30-day inactivity, explicit 'no consistency rules'. Dated only 'over a week ago'. | No usable date |
Not verified
Restricted countries— Only a generic 'not intended for residents of any country where distribution would contravene local laws' clause; Pakistan is excluded from the 2-Step by a help note. No named list found.Regulator— None stated for the prop entity. 'Broker backed' refers to Blueberry Markets, a separate company.Prime 2-Step reset time and payout minimum— Taken from the Legacy 2-Step article; the Prime 2-Step help article has not been read, so these two fields may differ.Soft breaches— None found; every listed breach is a hard breach.Prices by size— The widget shows one price per plan for whichever size was selected; the selected size is not readable from the page, so no price is recorded.T&C and 'Outline & Fees' PDFs— Linked in the footer (T&C August 2024; Outline & Fees August 2026); not yet read.
Terms & Conditions · Official trading rules · Official site
Logo used under nominative fair use for identification in a comparative review, taken from Blueberry Funded's own site — blueberryfunded.com (site icon). Blueberry Funded does not endorse this site.
Questions about Blueberry Funded, answered from the record
How is the Blueberry Funded daily loss limit calculated?
On Prime 2-Step, the daily loss limit is 4% of the higher of the previous day’s closing balance or closing equity, measured on balance or equity, resetting at 5:00 PM EST (from the Legacy 2-Step article). That basis is the part most comparison tables leave out, and it changes the dollar floor from day two onward.
Is the Blueberry Funded maximum drawdown static or trailing?
Static floor: 10% from initial balance on Prime 2-Step. The floor is set once and does not move as the account grows.
Does Blueberry Funded have a consistency rule?
No. Blueberry Funded publishes an explicit statement that no consistency rule applies to Prime 2-Step.
Has Blueberry Funded changed rules retroactively?
Not on our record. 1 rule change logged for Blueberry Funded, none applied to accounts that already existed.
What is the Blueberry Funded disclosure score?
67/100, computed from nine published criteria with published weights. It measures how much Blueberry Funded publishes about its own rules, not whether the firm is good.